Posted on 08/18/2006 9:11:49 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog
SCTC means nothing. It's not in the hostage letter either. And "Shall Be The Conqueror" is really a stretch in my book.
SBTC. it is in the ransom letter.
You are joking, but you don't know how strong a 6-year old can be.
The ransom note is SIGNED with "Victory" and then, "S.B.T.C".
Karr classmate offers theory on ransom-note mystery
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1686496/posts
That old yearbook says "Angelicy Forevermore".
Who had the history of twins..John or his wife?
Why could he only have supervised visits with his children? (That's probably a "duh".)
They should run GPR in that cemetery to look for unmarked graves. I hope for the best but fear the worst in this case.
...Other than that the ransom note was left (neatly, from how I heard it described) on the foot of the main stairways. He didn't forget the ransom note. He planted it exactly where he wanted it found.
what was meant there - was forgetting he had left the ransom note, that once it became a murder and not a kidnapping - why didn't the killer go back upstairs and take the letter.
true, he may have planted it exactly where he wanted when he thought he was going to take off with Jonbenet, but when he "accidentally" killed her that plan was foiled and he just left the ransom note where it was.
I'm thinking he didn't care at that piont. He was upset that he killed Jonbenet because "he loved her" and was mad at himself. He probably didn't care about the letter anymore to think about taking it with him or not.
I do think they have the right person in custody. Too many coincidences.
Possible.
Seems also possible he didn't set out to kill her, at least not admitting that to himself.
So when she died from asphyxiation he became angry and/or fearful.
Cound be he simply lashed out and she was the only other one there to bear the brunt of it.
Could be he wanted to disguise the fact that she died as he was in his twisted sick way "making love to her", so he wanted it to look like she died from a blow to the head, instead. In other words, not the victim of "love", but the victim of "violence".
Or as halls mentioned, perhaps he became so angry that she didn't "return his love" that he attacked her with the blunt instrument to act out his rage. Which just happened to coincide with near the time of death.
BTW...Anybody notice how he insisted on calling Patsy, "Patricia" in talking about contacting her. I know her name is Patricia but almost nobody in the public domain calls her that. I won't say nobody, but almost
Like he was determined to call her a name that others of the public didn't, to show he had an inside with her and her family, and as you say "their world".
I know.
I know. But you said SCTC was meaningful.
I just don't agree with the classmate.
Do you think Karr is guilty?
Unless they can place him in CI, I do not.
The couple also had twins who died at birth Sept. 1, 1989, whose names were Angel and Innocence, according to records in the New Cooper Cemetery outside Hamilton, Ala., where they had lived.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/08/17/MNGR6KK6FL1.DTL
Thailand is noted for transgender surgery. I wonder if Karr was in the midst of something like that. He seemed very effeminate to me on TV.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.