Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BunnySlippers

The ransom note is SIGNED with "Victory" and then, "S.B.T.C".


525 posted on 08/19/2006 12:41:30 PM PDT by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette
The ransom note is SIGNED with "Victory" and then, "S.B.T.C".

I'm not buying the Shall be the Conqueror either. Where's the identifier? Who is the conqueror? Where is the "I"? If it was really so important, he would have spelled it out so there would be no question in anyone's mind who held the power. He would have signed it more along the lines of - "Victory! I AM the Conqueror". SBTC in the note is meaningless and is of no consequence the way it is written to anyone but the writer.

On the other hand it could be the writer wanted to mislead the police and wrote the letters off the cuff.

On the third hand (or would we be to feet now?), it could be a common greeting or saying. I'm not leaning toward a cult, but as an example a cult/group/secret society might end conversations with "So Be The Cause" or "So Be The ... whatever".

601 posted on 08/19/2006 4:48:06 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson