Posted on 08/18/2006 9:11:49 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog
>>>Is it BOTH JMK's family and his 2nd ex-wife's family that are claiming they know he wasn't in Colorado at the time of the killing? I'd only heard about the ex-wife making that claim.>>>
JMK's family is saying that he was with them that year, but haven't presented any proof. If there is any proof. But honestly, you remember if your husband was out of town, that year would seem to stand out in your mind.
As you said Pedophiles have thier own chatrooms, usenet, etc etc... OK let's say that pictures of JonBenet Ramsey are being passed around, Karr sees these and is infatuated. He knows she lives in Boulder, Co from the descriptions with the pictures.
Then a light goes off. Daddies comapny or someone else he knows through those connections was doing or did work on a large home for a Ramsey family in Colorado. He puts 2&2 together.
Now he is infatuated with this beautiful little girl, and he knows exactly where she lives. To furthur speculate, maybe at this point he uses contacts, or sneaks into daddies company, etc and finds blueprints of the Ramsey home.. a plan begins to form......
Agreed. Furthermore, this guy could turn around tomorrow or the day after and decide to retract his original confession. It wouldn't be the first time such a thing has happened.
But if they can actually find the guy's DNA in the house, that would pretty much be the clincher.
I think you made your point quite well, and it's a vitally important point. Everything we in the general public have been led to believe about this case suggests that the killer was someone either in the family or close to the family.
Guilty or not in the Ramsey case, he needs to be locked up.
BTW, I recall reading of a killer (forgot the name) who confessed and deliberately included false details and thus the confession was thrown out.
Always liked that guy's music.
Wendy Murphy today said that the Ramsey's went to Georgia the day they found her dead?? Is that true....anyone remember this????
so you know David?
Maybe it's time you come clean.
It is very easily confirmed he was with his family or not in 1996, get a grip!
No picture, he's guilty, that's what you said.
Have you guys seen that psychic's 2002 drawing -- dead on match to this suspect. It was posted on Drudge. I think the Ramseys hired the psychic. Of course, being a skeptic and cynic, my first thought was that somehow the Ramseys convinced this guy to take the fall, and then had the psychic draw the picture from a photo of him.
He wasn't a transient, he wasn't homeless. At that time he had a house in Alabama, a wife, and three sons. Also other relatives. They are all going through their photos from Christmas 1996 to get proof that he was in Alabama when JBR was killed.
>>>10 years is a lot of time for details to leak<<<
Especially since Karr was being sucked in by the fraudulent Michael Tracey, coached by Lou Smit, who, as a hire in the Boulder DA's office, had access to ALL the details about the body.
"It is very easily confirmed he was with his family or not in 1996 ..."
I'm not so sure. For example, I remember where I was Christmas 1996. (At a girlfriend's parents' house, near Pittsburgh.) But we drove there from NC (no public transportation receipts), we stayed at their house (no hotel/motel receipts), and I don't recall any photos being taken (they would have to be time-and-date stamped, in any event.) Credit card receipts for gasoline and restaurant meals were tossed long ago. So, for confirmation of my stay I would have to rely on the good memory and truthful testimony of a former girlfriend, her sister, and/or brother-in-law! (Her parents are deceased.)
>>>he talked in detail to the relatives<<<
Yup. In particular, to the grandmother, Nedra Paugh, who never kept any details to herself. This is the woman who bragged about the size of her infant grandson's penis to all her acquaintances!!!
Patsy never corresponded with him. He believed she was, but it was really the police. I'm wondering if accurate details came out in those emails, and what he's saying now is bogus in an attempt to go for an insanity plea. DNA will answer the questions.
You cut off my quote and in that sense you took it completely out of context. Look at the qualifying language in the phrase that you removed from my statement.
This guy just may be a serial child killer. I could believe that. He just does not strike me as the kind of guy who would brazenly break into a house, and do the crime in the basement while the family was at home.
There are a lot of holes in this story. There appear to be rumors of DNA test confirmations, but nothing concrete so far. The pieces just don't seem to fit together.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.