Replies

When are the media and the talking heads going to apologize to the Ramseys for their vicious, and slanderous portrayal of them? Their incessant criticism of JonBenet's costume and the endless replays of her pageant video were designed to malign the now deceased mother with the purpose to convict her in public. The fools didn't mention that pedophiles rape and kill children indiscriminately, regardless of makeup or costumes. Ask John Walsh about it. As a matter of fact, I watched him on Larry King the day Patsy died, and he made it clear that Patsy and John were innocent.

Did you know that according to today's Washington Post, “male DNA residue was found in her underwear, but police never reported a match for the sample?” I can assure you that the sample didn't belong to anyone in the family or else one of them would be in jail by now.

Also, as per the WP, “in a 2003 libel case, US District Judge Julie Carnes in Atlanta concluded 'the weight of the evidence is more consistent with a theory that an intruder killed JonBenet that it is with a theory that Mrs Ramsey did so.' Lacey, the district attorney in Boulder, issued a statement saying she shared that view.”

The media, as usual, is irresponsible. They don't have an interest in the story as much as they do for creating a titillating or otherwise intriguing innuendo. That's what gets people to tune in, whether we like it or not.

All the attention for Natalie Holloway, for example, hinged on the sexy story of an attractive blonde on vacation who meets a guy she is attracted to and (maybe for the first time ever) threw caution to the wind. Then she ends up missing - presumed dead. Sex sells, innuendo sells, etc.

How about that honeymooning couple on a cruise. Part of the hook of that story was that the newlywed wife may have paired off with some other guy the night her hubby went missing/murdered. Sexy! People tune in.

The truth may or may not have anything to do with the innuendo, but it's the innuendo that sells, and it damages people's lives.