Someone Please explain to me exactly how they could keep it a secret that Jon Benet was drugged????
On it's face, it makes for good drama to conclude "oh yeah, only the killer would know this detail". But the results of her autopsy have been public for years.
So if she wasn't drugged, then John Karr is quite delusional..
sw
He also told family he'd been arrested in 2001 for killing Jon Bonet when in fact he'd been arrested on child pornography charges.
He couldn't answer a fair number of questioned posed to him by the media, which could easily be explained away, I suppose, but he seemed all too willing to talk about other matters.
As well, the family says they have family photographs from that Christmas which shows he was with them that year. We'll see if that pans out, but Christmas time is something the wife would remember pretty well, especially since they have kids.
I can tell you in murder investigations what is in the public record is not what is in the actual police files, coroners files or even judicial files until an arrest and actual trial takes place. Holdback evidence is a common tactic used by every law enfocement agency across the world.
Her autopsy report is public record, as they are in most states, however you'll notice the tox report is not included. I'm talking the full-blow, sample of blood, urine, stomach and intestional fluids, eye fluid, brain and spinal fluid etc that are sent for further toxocology study. It's very probably and extrememly easy to hold back information such as a particular substance injected into a victim that shows up during later tox tests but is never released to the public.
Don't be suprised if this guy is taken to trial for her murder, many bits of evidence never made public before will be introduced. Even with all the leaks in this case and "experts" who wrote books never found out about rarely are able to find out every bit of evidence or are willing to provide the information.
Or he is a liar-imagine!