[garbageseeker]

Short and sweet, but do you see one question about any criminal record there?

No. What bothers me is that they did not do a background check themselves. As a company that deals with the education of children they should automatically screen their educator applicants for criminal histories.

I don't know if not asking somehow makes you exempt from criminal or civil damages, do you?

The owner of the site has exposed themselves to a lawsuit. As we are chatting about this, the owners of the company are calling their lawyers and insurance company.

[A CA Guy]

This Kim who owns the site may own the company and if he is criminal negligent regarding his candidates, he may well be unable to hold up his hand and say sue my company which is bankrupt. He may find in the area of candidates/employees he may find the law jumps over the corporate barrier to bite him in the butt.

I don't think not asking relieves anyone from liability as an employment agency when placing adults into trusted positions with children, even if for overseas he appears to be based in Los Angeles.

I guess he could quickly learn about errors and omissions insurance and personal liability... YIKES

But yet again, what do we know?

[Rte66]

I don't think that's a real teacher employment site, if you get my drift. It all sounds like it's in code.