Skip to comments.
Did Humans Evolve? Not Us, Say Americans
New York Times ^
| 08/15/2006
Posted on 08/15/2006 2:30:35 PM PDT by FewsOrange
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: RunningWolf
You have yet to deny it btw. Do you deny it? Deny that FReepers go to the ACLU? You made the assertion -- it is up to you to defend it. I appreciate your attempt to change the framework of the discussion, but it really is your job, forensically, to support your (now) assertion. I think you can get it raised to "contention" but it is not unreasonable to ask you to provide some links to prove your statement (which statement does, honestly, require "proof").
I don't know if I want to spend a lot of time getting links that you will either reject or marginalize. It is really not that big of a deal to me whether you accept it or not. Its there if you have followed the threads, thats all.
My friend, I merely ask you to substantiate statements you have made. This places you in the position of either substantiating them or admitting you cannot substantiate them. I invite you to do either. You don't have to spend a lot of time providing a lot of links. A representative handful will do.
Your friend
FD2003
41
posted on
08/16/2006 6:46:44 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
So many jokes, so little time. LOL!
I can't believe no one has posted Ted Kennedy yet :)
42
posted on
08/16/2006 6:47:27 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: sylphly
I know I'm relatively new here, but the pattern in the 6 evolution related articles has been creationists disappearing as they start to lose the argument (or patience with the argument), and the evolutionists coming out in fuller force. You have vision. I have very respectfully asked several on this thread to support statements they have made -- not even in terms of the CR/ID vs TToE, but assertions as to the habits, morals, agenda, breakfast cereal selection, etc. of those who understand TToE.
I have yet to get a direct answer.
As you have also seen, when we post direct evidence of speciation, transitional fossils, etc. etc. etc. those who are less knowledgeable abandon the discussion.
What is sad is that this is willful ignorance. And I decided, after a contentious thread, I will treat my brothers and sisters who attempt to ply their trade of willful ignorance with love and respect (although I must admit to a little teeth gritting).
But you certainly have discerned the pattern. Good catch!
43
posted on
08/16/2006 6:55:58 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: sylphly
Oh, and welcome to FR! :)
We don't have meet and greet ceremonies, so if you need a little help, please FReepmail me ("Private Reply" on a given post or "Mail" at the upper right).
44
posted on
08/16/2006 6:58:04 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: freedumb2003
I can't believe no one has posted Ted Kennedy yet Or Helen Thomas, you know the picture I mean.
45
posted on
08/16/2006 7:04:49 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(A propensity to hope and joy is real riches; one to fear and sorrow, real poverty)
To: freedumb2003
As you wish:
Lookie Here Can you see a link between the Socialist societies and Evol- Believers?
46
posted on
08/16/2006 8:39:14 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Israeli defense strategy "Cogito Ergo Boom!")
To: FewsOrange
FWIW, I think this has been already posted.
47
posted on
08/16/2006 8:40:52 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: keithtoo
"Page Not Found
The page you've requested does not exist at this address. Please note:"
Nope
48
posted on
08/16/2006 8:43:11 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: My2Cents
The evos on FR will come on here and tell us we're all a bunch of slackjawed yokels for disbelieving their 19th Century mystery religionAll of them? Please. That is false generalization.
but they should be forced to explain why it is that whenever they start losing the argument, they hire the ACLU to go out to sue someone to impose their views on the rest of us.
No evo has hired the ACLU when "starting to lose an argument." Perhaps you are confusing issues.
They travel in suspicious circles.
Please demonstrate this.
49
posted on
08/16/2006 8:44:52 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: My2Cents
Its interesting that Darwinism applied to social behavior fuels a leftist viewpoint on all that its applied to. Please show how evolution can be applied to social behavior.
50
posted on
08/16/2006 8:46:38 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: yellowdoghunter
Nothing more to say? Then there's nothing more to learn.
51
posted on
08/16/2006 8:47:57 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: freedumb2003
Be prepared to wait...
forever.
52
posted on
08/16/2006 8:51:17 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: stands2reason
Be prepared to wait...forever.
Somehow I am remined of the Moody Blues:
Blasting, billowing forth with the power of 10 billion butterfly sneezes....
;)
53
posted on
08/16/2006 8:53:16 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
What's a girl like you doing in a place like this?
I thought you avoided these parts....
54
posted on
08/16/2006 8:55:26 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: My2Cents
The less depth a belief system has, the greater the fervency with which its adherents embrace it. The most vociferous, the most fanatical are those whose cobbled faith is founded on the shakiest ground. No offense, my friend, but you have described Fundamental Christianity to a "T." TToE is based on science and has a basis in fact and science for its understanding.
Christianity (of which I am an adherent) is based on faith which has a single text for its understanding.
Your sword cuts 2 ways.
55
posted on
08/16/2006 8:56:36 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: My2Cents
What can they say? We're gonna move to France with Arec Baawin?
56
posted on
08/16/2006 8:59:26 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
I'm going to start a FR Beautification League. My mission is to stamp out posts with Helen Thomas pics.
You with? :-)
57
posted on
08/16/2006 9:04:44 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: Tribune7
I start with taking on the base attacks that occur in the thread.
58
posted on
08/16/2006 9:07:11 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: stands2reason
I start with taking on the base attacks that occur in the thread.
59
posted on
08/16/2006 9:15:45 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Tribune7
60
posted on
08/16/2006 10:06:01 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson