Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gloves off in nude sculpture dispute
The Denver Post ^ | 8/3/06 | Monte Whaley

Posted on 08/03/2006 4:14:57 PM PDT by Millee

A determined group of Loveland residents vow to knock a nude bronze sculpture off its pedestal - or at least from its location near a busy street.

Supporters of the sculpture wonder if the community debate - and the publicity it has generated - is eroding the reputation of the city and its public arts program that has produced 269 statues.

"People may be thinking that this is a community full of prudes," said Kimberly Kreutzer, the wife of a local artist.

Several critics are pushing to have "Triangle" moved from its location at a busy roundabout on the eastern edge of Loveland to a park where people can choose whether to look at it. Others want the 7-foot-tall depiction of a nude man and two nude women completely removed from public view.

"I don't think it should ever have been produced and I don't think it belongs here in Loveland," said Melissa Morgan, a mother of five.

Morgan and others opposing the sculpture won a victory of sorts this week. The Loveland City Council on Tuesday agreed to study changing an ordinance to allow the council to overrule the Visual Arts Commission, which oversees the city's public art program.

Some supporters of the sculpture worry the council may be taking the first step toward removing the artwork altogether.

"I'm just afraid the council will cave in to the pressure," Kreutzer said. "It's really a form of censorship."

The debate over the sculpture, created by sculptor Kirsten Kokkin, has drawn attention from national media, including The New York Times.

The arts commission approved "Triangle" and its placement at East First Street and Sculptor Drive in Loveland last Friday. Kokkin says the statue symbolizes the interdependence of people and is not intended to be sexual.

Detractors, however, say the artwork is distracting to

motorists and harmful to children. The piece stands in a growing part of Loveland that includes a middle school, high school and a youth sports complex. In any other context, the statue would be considered obscene under city ordinances, said Dan Danowski, who wants it moved to another location.

"If you look at it, it's pretty clear the intent of the statue is sexual," he said.

City Councilman Glenn Rousey agrees with the assessment of another artist who spoke to the council Tuesday. "He said he knows what a sex act is, and this is not a sex act," Rousey said.

He worries the city may be setting a dangerous precedent by allowing specific groups to dictate what art is appropriate for public display.

"We have statues of very heavyset people. Does that mean we worry about offending obese people in the community?" Rousey said.

Unlike the sculpture's critics, resident Judi Schwandt wants the "Triangle" moved so that more people can enjoy it.

"I think it's absolutely beautiful, but people can't really see it well on the roundabout," she said. "This is something everyone should see."


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Local News
KEYWORDS: americantaliban; bigbutt; fatthighs; gratuitousnudity; maxlovesart; maxsnudies; maxssculpture; naughtybits; nudieschmoodie; pubicarts; taxdollarsatwork; uglyassin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2006 4:14:58 PM PDT by Millee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Millee

I think it's kind of cool. Better than some junkheap of concrete and steel.


2 posted on 08/03/2006 4:18:43 PM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlr; Jersey Republican Biker Chick; najida; Maximus of Texas; EX52D; Mike Bates; Mr. Jeeves; ...

What say you, art fans?


3 posted on 08/03/2006 4:19:16 PM PDT by Millee (A joke then, a joke N.O.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Millee

A Michelangelo or a Praxiteles this sculptor Kirsten Kokkin is surely not. They should have gotten it on the artistic merit [or rather lack thereof] instead of nudity.


4 posted on 08/03/2006 4:22:40 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Millee

What is the difference between "nude" and "naked"?


5 posted on 08/03/2006 4:35:56 PM PDT by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAY
"What is the difference between "nude" and "naked"?"
Aesthetical. "David" is "nude". "Bacchus" is "nude". But this crap is "naked". Had it possessed artistic merit and value [beyond that of its bronze at about a dollar per pound], it would be "nude", too.
6 posted on 08/03/2006 4:40:23 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Millee
To have the figures doing the same pose clothed would've detracted from the artistic statement, y'see.
7 posted on 08/03/2006 4:41:01 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
A Michelangelo or a Praxiteles this sculptor Kirsten Kokkin is surely not.

True, but at least from the photo it looks like it's probably better than 90% of what's out there.

8 posted on 08/03/2006 4:42:06 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Millee
"Triangle"

"Threeway"

9 posted on 08/03/2006 4:50:31 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Millee

yeah, I want one just like it for my coffee table.

MM


10 posted on 08/03/2006 4:58:10 PM PDT by motormouth (Whatever you are, be a good one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RAY
About 30 pounds.

{Bada-Boom!}

11 posted on 08/03/2006 5:02:05 PM PDT by Millee (A joke then, a joke N.O.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Millee
Ya know, it COULD have been worse....

( Brittany "Birthing" in Bronze )

12 posted on 08/03/2006 5:05:26 PM PDT by austinmark ("May the Flea's of a Thousand Camels Nest in ALLAH's Pubic Hair" !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinmark

13 posted on 08/03/2006 5:07:42 PM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Millee

You know, after spending all that time posing for that sculpture, I'd hate to see it covered up.


14 posted on 08/03/2006 5:22:42 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

Oh.....my eyes!!


15 posted on 08/03/2006 5:30:06 PM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

My eyes!! My eyes!!


16 posted on 08/03/2006 5:40:18 PM PDT by RockinRight (She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight; Osage Orange; austinmark

See, I win...uh, no, what I mean is...


17 posted on 08/03/2006 5:50:57 PM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Millee

I have wondered about the appropriateness of this sort of thing myself. A town near us, Walnut Creek, California, has a statue of a nude woman standing on a pedestal, reading a book. It is out on a busy street in their new shopping district (very popular and very busy shopping area). My 7 year old daughter sees it whenever we walk past it. I don't like it, but I figure that if I freaked out about it, I would give the thing more prominence in my daughters mind than it deserves. Instead, when she saw it, I made a comment about how silly/stupid-looking the woman is, standing there with no clothes on, like a little baby who doesn't know better (or some such thing like that - I can't remember EXACTLY what I said).

No doubt, some artiste-type on a similar council had it put there under the cover of it being non-sexual, and a "tasteful" nude. That's the "cover" they always use to do something like this. They are being oh-so reasonable, educated, mature, and open-minded about such things. If you disagree with them, you are the opposite.

I love it how these liberals come up with what they consider to be insulting names for anyone who disagrees with them. In case, the word chosen was "prude". It seems that on a social/mental scale, they have never advanced beyond high school, or grade school even.


18 posted on 08/03/2006 6:10:00 PM PDT by Zetman (I believe the children are the next generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Were you in the pool?


19 posted on 08/03/2006 6:29:26 PM PDT by BJClinton (What happens on Free Republic, stays on Google.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Millee

I do like his buns.


20 posted on 08/03/2006 6:35:40 PM PDT by Feiny (drunk, crazy and naked streaking isn't something that can be considered a normal, fun thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson