Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Long Do We Have?
Via email | July 27, 2006 | Unknown

Posted on 07/29/2006 10:50:06 AM PDT by oneolcop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: oneolcop

The item that popped out at me was the fact only 48 states are being used so I googled crime rates and snopes has this:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/tyler.asp

I wont paste the article.


21 posted on 07/29/2006 11:47:18 AM PDT by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

"First and foremost, Save the Republic!"

How, pray tell, do we accomplish that task?


22 posted on 07/29/2006 11:48:06 AM PDT by oneolcop (Take off the Gloves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: oneolcop

Yes. And I will grant you lands and titles.


23 posted on 07/29/2006 11:52:07 AM PDT by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TimSkalaBim

Whooopee!


24 posted on 07/29/2006 11:54:54 AM PDT by oneolcop (Take off the Gloves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
The first part of this is, in concept, the same as Aristotle's reasons for considering "democracy" to be a "corrupt form of government." 2,500 years ago, Aristotle concluded that a pure democracy would vote itself into bankruptcy and political failure.

John / Billybob
25 posted on 07/29/2006 12:01:22 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please see new message, here: www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: oneolcop
There is not enough data to be able to say.

This form of republic is very new. While the Romans had a form of republic it certainly did not take this shape.

If you apply the strictest of standards and say it is only lives as long as it does not change then the first US republic died in 1828 for sure and it can be argued that it died even earlier.

Theoretically as long as it remains flexible the lifespan could stretch to infinity.

26 posted on 07/29/2006 12:03:50 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (A propensity to hope and joy is real riches; one to fear and sorrow, real poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: oneolcop
Anybody else who wants in on my new government should speak up now.

I have openings for a Minister of Disproportionate Response and a Keg-Master.

Also, I have big plans for Camden. I want to make Camden the crown jewel of Mid-Atlantica. So, if anybody wants the job, now's the time to speak up.

27 posted on 07/29/2006 12:08:05 PM PDT by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: oneolcop
Seems simple to me. Enforce the law.

Can't recall many cases of voter fraud being prosecuted. Instead, every few years, I hear motions to restore voting rights to convicted felons and recently an amnesty for illegals, which will compound the problem.

Finagling the system goes way back and persists due to neglect from law enforcement.
28 posted on 07/29/2006 12:09:19 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: oneolcop

"What, in your estimation is the validity of the thought, however expressed and to whom attributed?'


I like the article and the primary quote, that is why I knew of some questions about the attribution.



29 posted on 07/29/2006 12:16:47 PM PDT by ansel12 (Life is exquisite... of great beauty, keenly felt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
As one who spent 40 years enforcing the law, I agree. The rule of law is what differentiates "us" from "them" When, "they" outnumber us, get elected on the promise of the liberal agenda, what does one do? Enforce the law(rule of) until they change the law. Immigration law? I was the officer who published Special Order # 40 of 1978 (as I recall) which stopped the LAPD from enforcing immigration law. The day that was published, the gates were opened for illegal immigration. Sad story...
30 posted on 07/29/2006 12:22:16 PM PDT by oneolcop (Take off the Gloves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: oneolcop
When, "they" outnumber us, get elected on the promise of the liberal agenda, what does one do?

LA is an example of the rise of the city state (not alone, but a shining example). The centers of wealth and commerce trend to decadence (not to forget Hollywood).

What can be done? Don't know. Create a new center of commerce and monitor the influx? Not in our lifetimes. An economic siege? Not very American. Rid the country of the NEA and begin teaching and instilling values in our successors.....hmmmm....think that over.
31 posted on 07/29/2006 12:57:27 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

If ever there is a breakdown in the system, as it is now, (such as a long-term power outage to the meto areas) there could be a die-off of some of their constituents. That could thin the herd a little. Then, the challenge would be controlling the recovery and placing sufficient conditions on them to change the balance of power. One can hope...


32 posted on 07/29/2006 1:31:57 PM PDT by oneolcop (Take off the Gloves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: oneolcop

Nice essay. I think it makes valid points.

I'd add one more.

To the extent that abundance, or the creation of wealth, means that a nation becomes more urban, that nation must necessarily become a nation of more regulations, more laws and less freedom. Urban life demands this, since with everyone living right on top of each other, everyone's actions are so much more likely to impact the lives of everyone else.

All modern societies are becoming predominantly urban.


33 posted on 07/29/2006 1:39:05 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"Too bad for the rabid doom and gloom hysterics we are a Constitutional Republic and not a Democracy."

Yes, you are right, but since the Constitution was amended to allow the collection of the income tax, the citizens did gain the described right to vote themselves not just the assets of the public treasury, but the assets of more successful citizens.

It may not be a direct democracy, thank God, but there are plenty of politicians out there buying votes. In both parties.

34 posted on 07/29/2006 1:42:07 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

Reminds me of the movie King Rat


35 posted on 07/29/2006 1:46:19 PM PDT by oneolcop (Take off the Gloves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: oneolcop

I didn't see the movie, but did read the book, if it's the one set in a Japanese POW camp.

I met a lady a few years ago, here in FL, who spent WWII in one of those camps. She and her husband were born in the Netherlands, he was employed by a rubber plantation in Sumatra. The Japanese overran the place, they spent the rest of the war interned in the camp, under terrible conditions. She had been 25 when captured, was a real beauty. In her 80's now. Has a lot of stories to tell.


36 posted on 07/29/2006 1:53:58 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson