Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ares 1 design change
Flight International ^ | 07/11/06

Posted on 07/10/2006 5:55:34 PM PDT by KevinDavis

The first test flight of NASA’s crew launch vehicle Ares 1 will use a four-segment solid-rocket booster for its first stage, not the five-segment design specified in the baseline requirement. Ares 1’s current design uses a Space Shuttle-derived five-segment SRB first stage and a new liquid-oxygen/liquid-hydrogen Rocketdyne J-2X-powered upper stage. The launcher will place the agency’s Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) into a suborbital trajectory, from which the CEV’s engine would boost it into low-Earth orbit.

The first Ares 1 test is due in April 2009. Steve Cook, NASA’s exploration launch vehicle director, based at Marshall Spaceflight Center, says the first ascent development flight test will “validate our models for max q [dynamic pressure] and stage separation” rather than test the entire ascent flight profile.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: ares; ares1; future; science; space

1 posted on 07/10/2006 5:55:36 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

2 posted on 07/10/2006 5:56:01 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

dang on only 3 yrs/ cool


3 posted on 07/10/2006 8:03:18 PM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I wonder how a 4 segment solid rocket booster will effect the overall performance versus a 5 segment one?


4 posted on 07/10/2006 8:11:24 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Make it alot more flight stable, plus the extra thrust devoloped by a 5 segment solid is overkill to say the least.


5 posted on 07/10/2006 8:37:25 PM PDT by docman57 (Retired but still on Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: docman57

I like overkill...more power. ;^)


6 posted on 07/10/2006 10:17:00 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

This is not a "design change." The four segment RSRMs are available *now.* by doing a preliminary test launch with an existing motor, we can test out some of the other systems... controls and such, and prove out other aspects of the design.


7 posted on 07/11/2006 6:06:50 AM PDT by orionblamblam (I'm interested in science and preventing its corruption, so here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
Sounds a lot like when they used the completely reliable, but underpowered Redstone launches for the first two Mercury launches until they could get all the bugs out of the Atlas missile. They could test the capsule, launch and recovery procedures, but had to wait for the big missile to do the real work in orbit. Same here. They can test the CEV with the smaller, but currently available booster, and then fly the missions with more science cargo when the more powerful booster becomes available.
8 posted on 07/12/2006 7:53:04 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/NASA_Awards_Contract_For_Ares_I_Mobile_Launcher_999.html

ROCKET SCIENCE

NASA Awards Contract For Ares I Mobile Launcher

Cape Canaveral FL (SPX) May 09, 2008

NASA’s Kennedy Space Center has awarded a contract to Hensel Phelps of Orlando, Fla., for the construction of the Ares I mobile launcher for the Constellation Program. Ares I is the rocket that will transport the Orion crew exploration vehicle, its crew and cargo to low Earth orbit. The contract includes an option for an additional Ares I mobile launcher.
It is a firm fixed-price contract with a value of $263,735,000, if all options are exercised.

The mobile launcher will support the Ares I and the vehicle’s associated ground support equipment. It will be used in the assembly, testing and servicing of the Ares I at existing Kennedy facilities.

The mobile launcher will transport the Ares I rocket to the launch pad and provide ground support for launches.

The mobile launcher consists of the main support structure that comprises the base, tower and facility ground support systems, which include power, communications, conditioned air, water for cooling, wash-down, and ignition over-pressure protection.

Hensel Phelps will supply all labor, materials and equipment necessary for construction of the Ares I mobile launcher. Ground support equipment, such as umbilicals, propellant and gases, instrumentation, controls and communications, necessary to support the Ares I rocket will be provided and installed under a separate contract or contracts.

The tower of the mobile launcher will have multiple platforms for personnel access and will be approximately 390 feet tall. Construction will take place at the mobile launcher park site area located north of Kennedy’s Vehicle Assembly Building at the space center in Florida.


This is not the Ares I launcher, but is the Ares I launcher launcher.


9 posted on 05/09/2008 10:31:58 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's still unclear what impact global warming will have on vertical wind shear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0805/16ares1x/

First Ares test launch likely delayed by pad conflict

BY STEPHEN CLARK
SPACEFLIGHT NOW

Posted: May 16, 2008

Delays in the space shuttle program could force a one-month slip of an early test flight of NASA’s next-generation rocket next year due to busy Kennedy Space Center launch facilities, agency officials said Thursday.

The schedule issue stems from the delayed production of new shuttle external fuel tanks at a Lockheed Martin Corp. factory near New Orleans. The work is taking longer than predicted, and shuttle managers will likely postpone the shuttle Atlantis’ mission to service the Hubble Space Telescope from late August to early October.

Plans call for two shuttles to be simultaneously prepared for flight in case a rescue flight is ordered to retrieve Atlantis’ seven astronauts if major damage is found in the shuttle’s thermal protection system tiles and panels.

The unique rescue requirement means the shuttle Endeavour will be prepared for launch from pad 39B, a complex that has been out of operational service since December 2006.

The delay of the Hubble repair mission will extend the shuttle program’s hold on the launch pad, a mobile launch platform and an assembly bay inside the cavernous Vehicle Assembly Building.

The facilities need to be transferred to the Constellation program several months before the Ares 1-X mission, a $350 million launch of a scaled back first stage of the rocket NASA will use to launch the Orion piloted spaceships.

Officials estimate the schedule holdup will cause a day-for-day slip in the Ares 1-X launch.

The new launch date could be in late May 2009, four-to-six weeks later than the flight’s current target of April 15, according to Jeff Hanley, Constellation program manager.

“We are doing what we can to look at what could be done to do parallel work or other ideas that might be in play to get the modification work to the Mobile Launch Platform done and still mitigate some of that impact to the 1-X launch date,” Hanley said. “But if we can’t come up with anything and it has to be a day-for-day slip ... that’s perfectly workable.”

KSC engineers are already moving ahead with work to install cleats to hold water bags inside the launch platform’s right solid rocket booster hole, which will be left empty for the Ares 1-X mission. Technicians will also add electrical connectors for an umbilical between the ground and the rocket’s first stage, and workers will put in a heritage ground control system from the Atlas rocket program, said Tracy Young, a KSC spokesperson.

The mobile platform will be carried to the pad for validation testing before engineers begin assembling the Ares 1-X components. Technicians will start stacking the rocket about eight weeks after the MLP is handed over to the Constellation program, Young said.

Most of the modifications to the launch pad will not begin until after Atlantis returns to Earth and Endeavour is moved to pad 39A to resume normal processing.

The pad’s Fixed Service Structure will be raised 100 feet feet and a new lightning tower will be added atop the complex to help protect the 309-foot tall Ares 1-X rocket from dangerous weather. That task should be completed by January, Young said.

Hanley said the rippling effect of the shuttle delays is not surprising because both programs share the same facilities.

“We walked into it with our eyes wide open that this could happen,” Hanley said. “When those assets become available to us, that’s when we’ll go and press to launch.”

Officials expect Ares 1-X flight hardware will begin arriving at the launch site this fall, beginning with roll control system parts in September. The four segments of the solid rocket booster first stage, a static fifth segment, and the dummy upper stage will be transported to KSC in October. A model of the Orion capsule and the launch abort system is expected at KSC by November.

The delay of the Ares 1-X mission should not affect future milestones in the rocket’s development, Hanley said.

“The Hubble slip and the 1-X launch date are really not in what I would call the near-term critical path for the first launch of Ares 1,” Hanley said.

Steve Cook, the Ares 1 rocket project manager, said he wants the flight data from the Ares 1-X launch at least six months before the rocket’s critical design review in March 2010, an important signpost in the booster’s early development.

“We would like to have the 1-X data in our hands no later than the fall of 2009, so that kind of gives us about six months worth of margin on 1-X getting off for flight,” Cook said.


Looks like a bottle rocket. They can’t be series.


10 posted on 05/18/2008 11:11:39 AM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson