Skip to comments.
SUPERMAN RETURNS - TO A PATERNITY SUIT
VANITY
| JULY 4, 2006
| AMOS THE PROPHET
Posted on 07/03/2006 10:45:13 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: Amos the Prophet
Lois was always pretty kinky, anyway.
To: Amos the Prophet
The sequel Superman the drug addict is probably forthcoming.
3
posted on
07/03/2006 10:48:41 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I looked in my rearview mirror.)
To: Amos the Prophet
Superman is just doing a Job Americans will not do.
To: Amos the Prophet
I hope it doesn't make back its $260 million cost.
To: Amos the Prophet
Rats - I was looking forward to it...
OTOH, tonight I saw the new "King Kong" ...if you have a spare three hours, it is EXCELLENT, just don't let the little ones watch it....too scary.
6
posted on
07/03/2006 11:06:30 PM PDT
by
bitt
(NY Times to New York: Drop Dead!)
To: Amos the Prophet
While we're on the subject of Superman iconography... isn't that supposed to be Lex Luthor - with an "o"?
To: Amos the Prophet
I'll not see this crap, thanks for your review. I can't believe they didn't make the usual plug for homosexers while they were at it.
8
posted on
07/03/2006 11:37:26 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(I'm from a little place called Smithereens. It ain't pretty out here.)
To: Richard Kimball
I was so glad I had to work all day. The family and some friends all wanted to go see it and they wanted to wait until I was off. I told them, no go on, I don't care for movie theater productions. With the exception of "The Passion" a couple years back the last movie I saw (in it's entirity) in a movie theater was "Back to the Future." After taking my 2 young boys to see "Temple of Doom" which was rated G at first, I got up and dragged them out with my hands over their eyes after the first 10 minutes. We never went back to another movie as a family.
Now that the boys are older, they can go see hollywood garbage if they want, but I won't give my money to that business, period. I don't rent their videos, or tapes, or buy their sound tracks. If a movie really peaks my interest I'll watch it on TV if it ever gets there. If I don't like it I can flip it off and go wash a toilet instead.
To: Jaysun
I can't believe they didn't make the usual plug for homosexers while they were at it.
))))))))))))))
I am not certain they didn't. The TV show, SEX in NY is, according to Amm Coulter, a portrayal of the homosexual lifestyle: gratuitous sex with unlimited partners.
Superman lost his boyscout status in this movie. No longer is the love between Lois and Superman unrequited. It is not only lustily satisfied complete with bastard child but Lois is now living in sin with the richest guy she could snooker into believing he was the daddy. AND... the poor twit still loves Superman the cad.
I would NEVER take a child to see this travesty. Little boys everywhere leave the theatre crying over the loss of their hero to Hollywood bath house morals.
Thanks for the heads up on Luthor, Jack Hammer. This is the first time consummate evil has been portrayed in Marvel comics as a classy guy paying back the establishment for injustices real and imagined. What consummate drivel.
10
posted on
07/04/2006 4:53:55 AM PDT
by
Louis Foxwell
(Here come I, gravitas in tow.)
To: Amos the Prophet
"Sex in The City" not Sex in NY, a distinction with no difference.
11
posted on
07/04/2006 4:56:29 AM PDT
by
Louis Foxwell
(Here come I, gravitas in tow.)
To: Amos the Prophet
One more: Ann, not Amm. Forgive me, Greater One. I must remember to type with my glasses.
To: Amos the Prophet
13
posted on
07/04/2006 9:52:50 AM PDT
by
fzx12345
(Three lefts don't make a right; they invent one.)
To: Amos the Prophet
Thank you for this review. I was wondering lately where
Spider-Man 3 is? I guess that's next summer. I think the Spider-Man movies have done a better job of portraying the real hero from the original Marvel Comics than what you describe here of Superman and what I've seen of Batman. Hollywood gets it - they can't
not see
the numbers - most there just don't
want it to be so that Americans really
like good
clean fun.
To: .30Carbine
I wanted to get more hits for this piece but it was pushed from Culture to Chat and has had nearly no readership.
To: Amos the Prophet
IIRC, Asimov(?) wrote a short article -- "Man of Steel Woman of Flesh" or something similar.
It analyzed what would be required for Superman to produce progeny with Lois. The first problem is that his super sperm would blow the top of her head off. So, he would have to do the hand jive and then use his super speed to catch it.
I can't remember the rest -- I'll see if I can find it.
16
posted on
07/05/2006 9:42:10 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Let them die of thirst in the dark.)
To: freedumb2003
To: fzx12345
So much for the American way.
18
posted on
07/05/2006 9:50:53 AM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
To: new cruelty
That's it! Thanks!!!
This should be required reading for anyone addressing Supe's procreation.
19
posted on
07/05/2006 10:27:48 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Let them die of thirst in the dark.)
To: bluesagewoman
There is no way Temple of Doom was rated G. It was rated PG and pretty much invented the PG-13 rating.
20
posted on
07/05/2006 10:33:49 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(First Supreme Emperor of the NAU!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
