Posted on 06/14/2006 1:22:02 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk
Author Jerome Corsi and Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., will be guests tomorrow on G. Gordon Liddy's radio show to discuss the White House's effort to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.
Corsi and Tancredo will join Liddy for the entire 11 a.m. hour, Eastern time, and take calls from listeners.
Corsi reported this week that Bush administration working groups have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.
The trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce.
Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."
WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.
Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.
Thanks for the ping. #609 really was worth reading.
After highlighting the issue this week, I hope G. Gordon Liddy keeps his focus on it. These talk radio people drive one crazy with the way they jump from one controversy to another. We need heat, sure. But light would be more helpful right now.
Actually, the written form, such as we enjoy here on FR, is much more conducive to getting the info about this stuff out than is talk radio.
Poorly written, that...
I hope they're really scared, because any politician from either of the "two" parties (which really are one) going along with this monstrosity should be tarred and feathered and ejected from Washington.
This is traitorous behavior, and Americans will not stand for the selling of the America our ancestors fought to preserve. These sellouts are asking for another civil war.
This is a major US worker issue and this message needs to get to union members. My impression is that it has no traction in their ranks.
Diane Feinstein is a member of the CFR and if their agenda was known to California unions, there's no reason why the conservative Mountjoy running against her could not beat her in Novenmber.
http://www.econ.puc-rio.br/PDF/peter%20kenen.pdf
Page Two: How did 1992 currency speculation attack on the lire and pound influence the move to the a monetary union? What happened in Mexico and Asia and did institutional reforms follow immediately?
Anyone have insight?
http://individual.utoronto.ca/emilygilbert/IndexFiles/Inevitability.PDF
The Inevitability of Integration? Neoliberal
Discourse and the Proposals for a New North
American Economic Space after September 11
Emily Gilbert
University of Toronto
See what you get when you play along? Absolutely nothing. Nothing about un/constitutionality, nothing about policy, just some blather about treason.
We need some statists to come along and force DPW to relinquish its authority assets at an artificially low price. That would be the patriotic thing to do. [queue America the Beautiful]
You are anti citizen and anti sovereignty.
Oh, for heaven's sake, hedge. A "working group" is a committee appointed by a bureaucracy. Universities have "working groups", businesses have "working groups", nonprofits have "working groups". They are supposed to focus on a task, investigating it and issuing a report.
Use the term "temporary subcommittee". There is nothing unique or mysterious about the term "working group".
I love how you ask 1000 questions but never bother to find out a single answer.
Silly, those were questions were answered on page two. Did you read the document?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.