Posted on 06/12/2006 6:23:16 AM PDT by conservativecorner
I thought as much.
Since the issue isn't about Jim's posts, I fail to see why you all continue feel the need to point his posts out to me. It certainly doesn't state at the FR homepage that all people must have mind melds before they post, or is it your opinion that I'm supposed to be a Borg, or Borg-like, and am only allowed to post something that's in consensus with his views? Another hint: I'm not a Borg and I obviously don't agree with Jim's opinion on this topic, and will not ever.
If someone posts more than their personal opinions, however, which refutes ALL THE INFORMATION I posted at 263, which refers to articles located at:
The White House, CFR, the U.S. Department of State, SPP.gov, the Commission for Labor Cooperation, the North American Commission on Environmental Cooperation, the North American Development Bank (of which Condi Rice is a Board Member), North America's SuperCorridor Coalition (NASCO), the North American Inland Port Network (NAIPN), the Union-Tribune, the Hutchison Ports Holdings Groupand the 2006 Texas Republican Party Platform, among others.and that information is credible, I will take that into consideration. MY POST has much more to do with the topic about which Corsi writes, you're stuck on stupid.
And you don't "get it": you're the one who falsely accused me of hijacking other threads and then claimed that I expect you to hunt down my posts. That's future tense. Your accusations could only mean, if true, that I've already hijacked threads because you've already seen those posts. (That's past tense.) Providing evidence for your claims is all I asked. I asked only for the example from ONE thread. Don't make personal dispersions against others if you can't prove your false comments.
Yes but you cannot tell that to fools who have wrapped themselves so tightly in conspiracy...and large quantities of aluminum foil.
I would think that endorsing the doing away with an American's job in favor of giving it to someone in a Chinese Communist port in Mexico is damned unamerican.
There are several union issues I disagree with but I don't want to see a person lose his job simply because he is a union member.
I disagree that I was insulting. A knee jerk response to any issue is still a knee jerk.
Overlooked in all this is the fact that laws will have to be conformed in all three "nations."
I understand that an overseeing parlimentary system involving all three governments will be implemented similar to the European union which has completely trashed the idea of national sovereignty in Europe. Our laws will have to conform to the union's laws which, of course, will be proposed and implemented by NGO's and corporations. The concept of citizen rule is effectively ended.
It cannot be stopped any more than the Euro union can be stopped.
What about them?
A transfer of sovereignty makes the territory no longer part of America. American law no longer applies within those boundaries. No NGO is sovereign. I suppose they could operate out of an embassy, but they'd be piggybacking on the sovereign status of the embassy.
>>>No NGO is sovereign.
I don't think this is true at all. Unless there is a difference between types of NGOs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_organization
*I suppose they could operate out of an embassy, but they'd be piggybacking on the sovereign status of the embassy.*
Correct.
Yes, just like we have to "understand" why muslim terrorists blow the sh** out of everyone in sight, right? What a liberal thing to say!
A wall will not keep 100 percent of the ILLEGALs out of the country but it sure as hell will stop most of them, making it easier for the border patrol to do their job, allowing apprehension of those the do make across. More importantly it will emphasize to the world that we are a sovereign country and not part of Mexico, something Vicente and President Bush don't seem to grasp.
And it looks like the thepraxisproject.org does partner with Embassies and also does incorporations.
thepraxisproject.org is also an NGO coyote for illegals.
So, the monies thepraxisproject.org touches with their NGO funds makes everything exempt from USA law then, right?
Thanks, I already addressed that point earlier in this thread.
No NGO is sovereign. They may have members that are nations, but that doesn't mean anything.
To the extent that they do anything outside of sovereign territory within our country, they are subject to our laws. That would apply to any telephone conversations, or any other communications or actions.
We're not able to enter a foreign embassy and arrest anyone, but we can certainly arrest them when they leave it, unless they are a credentialed diplomat.
NGO's enjoy no special protection for anything they do.
Then maybe I'm thinking of IGOs?
http://www.uia.org/legal/app35.php
Exactly.
Even IGOs are not sovereign. NATO would be an example.
Well then I'm very confused.
That's correct, but I was referring to the benefits of sovereignty. They do get the advantages of whatever laws they might operate under.
In that regard, they're no different than churches or charities that are tax-exempt.
DG, a sceptical person such as yourself should be made aware of this:
http://www.worldforum.org/Commission-On-Globalisation/homelinks/CommissionFinalReport.htm
STRATEGIC PURPOSE
The purpose of the Commission on Globalisation was to undertake an inclusive and comprehensive multi-stakeholder inquiry into the nature and character of globalization; and to develop integrated thought and action leading to specific recommendations for governance and policy-making at a global level that promoted greater social equity, environmental stability, enhanced security, and sustainable economic growth.
The Commission served as an incubator, catalyst and integrator for innovative leaders and institutions working to bring greater equity, democracy and accountability to globalization and global governance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.