Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor's Silence on Duke Rape Case Leaves Public With Plenty of Questions
NY Times ^ | 06/12/06 | By DUFF WILSON and JONATHAN D. GLATER

Posted on 06/12/2006 4:27:33 AM PDT by Perdogg

DURHAM, N.C., June 9 — When a woman hired to dance at a Duke University lacrosse team party claimed that members of the team raped her, Michael B. Nifong, the district attorney for Durham County, responded with an aggressive, unflinching and very public investigation.

"There's no doubt in my mind that she was raped and assaulted at this location," Mr. Nifong said on national television after the case surfaced in March. Mr. Nifong called other lacrosse players "hooligans" who had aided, abetted or covered up for the rapists. Local police officers seemed equally certain that they had a horrific crime to solve.

But in the intervening months, the case has come to appear far less robust. Three players have been indicted, but evidence that has surfaced, much of it turned over to defense lawyers by prosecutors and then filed in court with defense motions, has thrown the woman's claims into doubt. Mr. Nifong, so vocal at first, has refused to speak publicly about the case since the beginning of April.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; johnlewis; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-175 next last
To: Biblebelter
Mr. Vann said Mr. Nifong could drop the case, but the political price would be high.

Is that Mr. Vann's criteria for wheher a case should be pursued or dropped - the "political price"?

61 posted on 06/12/2006 10:00:47 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze

I've never thought any of them were guilty...but for the times to backflip, could also mean that one of the boys parents has been a long time democratic party supporter.


62 posted on 06/12/2006 10:28:22 AM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Katya

More like Bob Bennett...


63 posted on 06/12/2006 10:31:24 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter

I agree that he is "just a white puppet, dancing on a string"....and I think that he put himself in that position. I'll bet that his days are consumed by thoughts that what he thought was a quick way to get votes could cause him permanent damage


64 posted on 06/12/2006 11:20:45 AM PDT by old and cranky (You! Out Of The Gene Pool - Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: photodawg
The "case" doesn't come up until spring 2007. He will not prosecute personally, he will hand off to an assistant.

Nifong has said he will try this case himself. He has even boasted that the defense is scared of him. But since there was no DNA found in or on the victim he could hand it off to Tracey Cline since she has shown she has no problem in going forward with bogus rape cases with no DNA.
65 posted on 06/12/2006 1:03:16 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
However, in November if an opponent can garner enough upset Democrats and all the Republicans, Nifong can be defeated.

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Interesting, enlightening in that I now understand why the case was docketed for a year from now, but not very promising regarding his defeat.
66 posted on 06/12/2006 2:05:03 PM PDT by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

hand it off to Tracey Cline since she has shown she has no problem in going forward with bogus rape cases with no DNA.

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

There was plenty of DNA inside her, just none of it from the accused. (smile). It was kind of like the Maury show where they try to find the baby daddy. They asked her who could the DNA be from and she named three names that she had sex with in the past 48 hours and that's how they matched her "boyfriend".
I hope all young athletes take heed of this situation.
It's just not worth the risks to party like that under any circumstances.


67 posted on 06/12/2006 2:12:29 PM PDT by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
"The NYTimes still can't bring itself to call her a stripper or prostitute." or tell its readers she was f*&ed-up on Flexirol and alcohol.

The fools that read the NYTimes would go into shock if too much truth was revealed in the article. The NYTimes will dole out the facts slowly to avoid heart attacks from its elderly readers.

Remember the Times readers have been told the LAX boys are a gang of rapists, it'll take awhile to reveal the real story.
68 posted on 06/12/2006 2:15:35 PM PDT by don'tbedenied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: photodawg
There was plenty of DNA inside her, just none of it from the accused.

That's what I meant. Just like in the 2002 case of Leon Brown.

69 posted on 06/12/2006 2:32:59 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: tomzz
"The mayor of a city can make the life of a prosecutor REAL unpleasant."

How ?

70 posted on 06/12/2006 3:30:56 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied

"Cooling the mark"


71 posted on 06/12/2006 3:34:07 PM PDT by stands2reason (You cannot bully or insult conservatives into supporting your guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bjc

Yes, it has, and he can be. The question is not IF he can be pursued, but rather WHO will undertake it. As I see it, nobody at the state level is going to do it. the defense should seek assistance from the feds and/or through fed court.


72 posted on 06/12/2006 3:59:29 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68

There's enough on Nifong now with the bogus search warrants to go after him. They only need Himan's testimony as to what Nifong instructed him to do and what not to do that point to misconduct.


73 posted on 06/12/2006 4:02:01 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: managusta

One thing he can do is frighten Mangum into not making it known she will not testify, just as he frightened her into agreeing to testify when he needed her. If she bails out, he can publicly state that she and her doctors have informed him that she is too mentally fragile and unstable to testify and, that although he regrets not being able to go forward with the case because he is convinced the accused are guilty, he has no choice but to dismiss because he cannot proceed without her testimony as evidence. He can tell Mangum that dismissing the charges does not preclude her from pursuing the case civilly, that she is in no trouble, and have a nice life, he wishes her well, and same for Kim.

It would be easy to scare her into declining to testify now simply by pointing out all the evidence of her lies and instability and line of work and personal conduct the defense got their hands on and, alas, there was nothing he could do to prevent it. That would send her over the edge and they would have no trouble getting a doctor to state she's not capable of testifying.

What's bizarre is that this is a ploy generally used by the defense to stop a prosecution - that the defendant is "non compos mentis", meaning not mentally capable of understanding what is going on, the severity of it, the content of it, etc.. The fact that she was about to be committed that night works to their advantage in this respect.


74 posted on 06/12/2006 4:14:43 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

She can't run again in this election. You only get one bite at the apple per each election.


75 posted on 06/12/2006 4:17:21 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

No, I think he's saying it's Nifong's criteria, perhaps.


76 posted on 06/12/2006 4:18:41 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights

Month or so back, Protect the Bill of Rights and I did some digging on surname "Cheek", Durham.


77 posted on 06/12/2006 5:18:13 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Alia

Isn't Crystal's mom's maiden name Cheek?


78 posted on 06/12/2006 5:39:41 PM PDT by I want to know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
Such a scenario is highly unlikely due to the documentation of the entire case being made public immediately after closure.

Any revelations of misbehavior on the part of Nifong or the Durham Police would open the floodgates of civil litigation.
You can bet that by now the Mayor of Durham has paid a call on Nifong.There was no coffee.

The die is cast....trial.Those that live by the racial card etc.
79 posted on 06/12/2006 5:42:33 PM PDT by managusta (corruptissima republica plurimae leges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Alia; TexKat
I take that back in re the dig on Lewis Cheek: It was TexKat
80 posted on 06/12/2006 5:44:04 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson