.....and the words become prophecy.
Posted on 06/08/2006 2:03:55 PM PDT by Mike Nifong
The motion also says the alleged victim told Durham police that she had performed for a couple at a Raleigh hotel hours before the Duke lacrosse party. She told police that she used a vibrator. Osborn suggests that could be the source of the vaginal injuries mentioned in the rape kit report. (snip) Osborn says the accuser gave conflicting accounts of what happened. The motion says medical records indicate she told a doctor that she used no alcohol or drugs. The accuser told the sexual assault nurse that she had consumed one drink of alcohol and was taking Flexeril, a prescription drug used to treat muscle spasms.
The alleged victim told a doctor the next day at UNC Hospitals that "she was drunk and had had a lot of alcohol that night," the motion said.
She later told police that she had consumed a 24-ounce bottle of beer and then told police she had two 22-ounce bottles of beer, according to the motion.
(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...
ROFL! Maybe the F/A said that Kim had a beard.
I don't know anything about that area, but on another board they were saying she went to another hospital the next day. This is the quote they are using...
The alleged victim told a doctor the next day at UNC Hospitals that "she was drunk and had had a lot of alcohol that night," the motion said.
http://boards.courttv.com/showthread.php?s=996fc8b068c801592ae62e4533e32934&threadid=266523
I'm extremely curious about this aspect of the motion, too. What, exactly, was withheld?
It sounds to me like the defense has been getting the documents they were seeking directly from DPD.
If he was trying to help Mangum bail out of her accusation, he would say it. Her pimp would not want to get involved if he can avoid it.
.....and the words become prophecy.
Inconclusive as to what specifically? The fingernails? Or something else?
yeah, I guess. What a week. This is approaching Kafkaian dimensions.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Hard to believe, isn't it? Well put.
It sounds to me that that part of the motion is saying that they withheld certain exculpatory evidence from the judge who would have had to sign off on photo lineup and other searches. She was making contradictory statements from day one, so much so that the investigation should have never gotten anyway near as far as it did.
I seriously doubt that. Roberts is already on record all over the place, including after her arrest, saying that she didn't see a rape.
We know there were two series of DNA tests done.
Are you saying there were two rape kits done? Two separate examinations? What, exactly?
By the way, hello, and how are you? I hope your mother is doing better. :)
No vaild reason, except to harrass them without their attorneys present, or to hire private dicks at the taxpayer's expense to follow them around to see if they say anything incriminating about the accused, or to get wiretaps to listen to their phone calls and then seize their computers and emails at the end of the summer to see if there's anything incriminating that he can use to keep this case alive. I also would not be surprised if he was to turn the address information over to his buddy, Malik Shabazz, on the sly so he and his thugs can harrass them over the summer. There's little I would put beyond Nifong's skullduggery at this point. It just gets worse and worse for him as the defense builds a nice civil rights case against him and Durham County.
I don't buy that- when someone pleads guilty, they are questioned at length about whether they understand the plea and its implications. If she were to be required to register as a sex offender, they would have to say so and explain it in open court. There is no slipping it under the table.
Yeah, the N&O and even WRAL are in the tank.
Now, I haven't read every word, but I would caution everyone, in regard to the flexiril we shouldn't assume she had a prescription.
Paging Brian Taylor and Travis Magnum - Would you like to revise your statements about that night?
I'm not even sure that is legal. Besides, based on Roberts public testimony, wouldn't she be impeached as a witness? Again though, your post was the only thing that remotely makes sense for the LIEfong case. Mangum just needs to come out and say that Kim Roberts stole her money and that she made up the rape allegation so (fill in the blank...probation revoked?...social services taking the little ones?...drug violation with unprescribed Flexeril?).
What a mess.
Well, if that's really the case, then it explains why he avoided getting any (exculpatory evidence offered to him) and rushed in to get his indictments before any could be rammed down his lying throat.
Are you sure he's required to present exculpatory evidence? I have heard NC attorneys state on the talking head shows once or twice that it's not required, and that the GJ has the right to further investigate.
So Jesse Jackson and his organizations are giving scholarships to whores/dancers who perform with vibrators? This should do the racists who back her proud IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.