Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Quietly Creating NAFTA Plus
Human Events Online (via Raiders News Update) ^ | May 24, 2006 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 06/07/2006 10:00:09 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Tulane

You said -- "This article is sensational rubbish."

Is this the same type of "sensational rubbish" that was written about, regarding Kerry and the Swift Boat Vets?

Just wondering if this was the kind of "rubbish" that this author puts out, you see...

Regards,
Star Traveler


21 posted on 06/07/2006 11:28:05 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
This is part of the advancing NEW WORLD ORDER. Read None Dare Call it Conspiracy to read about the regions that will be set up.

Mexico, America & Canada have already been designated as a region.

22 posted on 06/07/2006 11:29:23 AM PDT by chit*chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever; All
If accurate, this is distrubing:

http://sixthcolumn.blogspot.com/2006/06/trans-texas-corridor-of-north-american.html

Trans-Texas Corridor of the North American Union



Check out this WND report by Jerome Corsi that describes the route for the 12-lane highway that is a part of the North American Union...The NAFTA Super Corridor will be constructed largely by private companies that intend to operate the new I-35 as a toll road. North America's SuperCorridor Coalition Inc., or NASCO...

23 posted on 06/07/2006 12:45:35 PM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Loosen up your tinfoil hat. It seems it has cut off the blood flow to your brain.

Your life must be absolutely miserable. Do you have anything to live for except George Bush?

24 posted on 06/07/2006 1:05:06 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
This CFR scenario has not only been gossipped about, but also spelled out explicity by the CFR itself. It's all in this pdf file.

EXCERPT:
WHAT WE SHOULD DO BY 2010 • Lay the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America. The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf
25 posted on 06/07/2006 1:15:42 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
This analysis has been advanced by economist Miguel Pickard at the Center for Economic and Political Research for Community Action (CIEPAC) in Chiapas, Mexico.

Doing the tinfoil analysis Americans are too sane to do.

26 posted on 06/07/2006 1:33:03 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Contrary to NAFTA, whose tenets were laid out in a single negotiated treaty subjected to at least cursory review by the legislatures of the participating countries

Nope, NAFTA was written as a 'trade agreement', rather than a treaty, and only needed 50% + 1 votes in both houses to pass. It passed in the Senate with 61 votes and in the House 234-200. A treaty requires 2/3 agreement in the Senate.

27 posted on 06/07/2006 1:47:54 PM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

"Nobody is suggesting we allow Mexico or Canada to have a say in what our military does, how or who we tax..." Mexico has plenty to say to you about how you're taxed...from your health insurance premium rates and state and federal subsidies which reflect their gratuitous care in our hospitals, our local tax rates which have to support law enforcement to deal with their crime.....etc etc etc


28 posted on 06/07/2006 2:04:39 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

Katherine Harris, a Florida Republican Representative running for the senate has sponsored this bill. Click on the text of legistlation.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR02672:

She wants us to secure Mexico's southern border.


29 posted on 06/07/2006 2:43:52 PM PDT by texastoo ("trash the treaties")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

There is a debate on the origin of hamburgers. Also, Canada has been expected to become part of the United States, and there are many who expect the same for Mexico. However, if those countries, with the United States, were to form one country, the country should be the United States, with Canada and Mexico being added to this country rather than forming a new one. As the article (from an apparently unreliable source) points out, Canada could hydrate the United States, and Mexico could provide oil. Plus, with a population of around four hundred million and a higher birthrate, the United States could be in a position to keep its lead over china and india.


30 posted on 06/07/2006 7:15:09 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu (www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chit*chat

Canada, the United States, Mexico, and other countries are already part of a region, its called North America.


31 posted on 06/07/2006 7:18:17 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu (www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

The United States should not copy Europe with a North American Union (they can copy the United States with a United States of Europe). Also, the country with Canada and Mexico should still be the United States of America. The country stayed the United States of America after the Louisiana Purchase, Gadsen Purchase, Mexican American War, taking over some of Oregon Country, Alaska, Hawaii, taking over some parts of Maine, etc.


32 posted on 06/07/2006 7:23:31 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu (www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Please stop trolling, Johnny. Check out this thread. Please note the source.

No cheers, unfortunately.

33 posted on 06/07/2006 7:49:50 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
However, if those countries, with the United States, were to form one country, the country should be the United States, with Canada and Mexico being added to this country rather than forming a new one.

If that were to happen, I would support changing the name to something more reflective of the truth, such as the United Socialist States of America.

34 posted on 06/08/2006 6:55:32 AM PDT by newgeezer (Repeal all Amendments after XV. Yes, ALL of them. Yes, I mean that one, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jumper
Of course, NAFTA is the regional trade zone, following the EU model with a regional currency. There will be 5 to 7 EU-NAFTA type free trade zones when the globalization completes the phase of economic integration.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

You've exposed their secret plan so now the CFR is watching you......Be afraid...be very afraid!

35 posted on 06/08/2006 8:54:33 AM PDT by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson