New York officials were given a one-page tally that explained, in part, how the region's risk-based standing was calculated.
The document said the region had no "national monuments or icons."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
90% of the population in both cities sees the administration as a bigger threat than terrorists so they should feel safer now. Right?
2 posted on
06/01/2006 1:12:29 PM PDT by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
Oh boo hoo. The world doesn't revolve around you New York, you too California.
3 posted on
06/01/2006 1:12:30 PM PDT by
NapkinUser
(Why isn't there a 'virtual fence' around the White House?)
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
Thanks for joining. Now leave.
4 posted on
06/01/2006 1:13:29 PM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
Hey dumbo. Get the Albany yahoos to tax us some more and protect the "monuments"
idiot democrap.
5 posted on
06/01/2006 1:14:13 PM PDT by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
I believe she belongs to us.
NJ Liberty State Park.
6 posted on
06/01/2006 1:14:21 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
they have basically turned federal homeland security spending - into pork projects for local governments all across the country.
8 posted on
06/01/2006 1:15:51 PM PDT by
oceanview
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
As Mayor Bloomberg says, "Nobody ever arrested a terrorist with a map of a cornfield in his pocket."
New York is a target. It makes sense to spend the money where the target is. Homeland Security money is turning into just one more big barrel of pork.
9 posted on
06/01/2006 1:16:07 PM PDT by
jebeier
(RICE '08)
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
When they cut funding to Baltimore, the mayor went on TV and called the Commander in Chief a terrorst.
10 posted on
06/01/2006 1:16:40 PM PDT by
TET1968
(SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
NYC has received the lion's share of Homeland Security funds for the past five years. What about the rest of the nation? Terrorists don't only go after the marquee targets, but also look for the weak link (i.e., Beslan). Not surprisingly, Peter King is jumping at another opportunity to bash the CinC during wartime.
12 posted on
06/01/2006 1:17:17 PM PDT by
inkling
To: The Mayor; birdsman; Victoria Delsoul; nicmarlo; deadhead; DollyCali; eleni121; rocky88; Mr. K; ...
Have at this idiot. He wants more money for NYC. LOL
13 posted on
06/01/2006 1:18:04 PM PDT by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
Adminstration to New York: "Drop Dead"Hmmm, I believe it was actually New York, a la Hevesi, just told Bush to drop dead, that Schumer would shoot him between the eyes.
15 posted on
06/01/2006 1:19:09 PM PDT by
MJemison
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
I think the New York papers have gone a bit overboard on this one today.
It's not just The stupid Slimes, even the normally conservative New York Post had to have a go too.
I think I detect more than a whiff of typical New York arrogance here.
Just look at the the Post's front page headlines today :
"Feds slash our funds to boost hicks in sticks"
http://www.nypost.com/
Now how do you like that?
That's arrogance and condescension for you right there.
The fact that I live here doesn't mean I am going to condone such hysteria.
16 posted on
06/01/2006 1:19:30 PM PDT by
Jameison
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
Bush better do what they say or New York might vote for the Democrats in '08!
(/sarcasm)
18 posted on
06/01/2006 1:19:56 PM PDT by
inkling
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
Your making up a headline, newbie.
NYT has it:
Security Cuts for New York and Washington .
26 posted on
06/01/2006 1:21:59 PM PDT by
Plutarch
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
Funny how these clowns suddenly believe there are terrorists!
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
They have been getting money for five years. Are they not fortifying and reinforcing possible targets? After a few years, there should be fewer and fewer items that need to be upgraded. If the money stayed the same, pretty soon, dogs would be wearing bullet-proof vests.
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
I thought that the "so-called War on Terror" was just made up by Bush to justify attacking Iraq to steal their oil. There's no danger to New yorkers -- smile, be happy.
46 posted on
06/01/2006 1:28:19 PM PDT by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
Nice photo. France did one thing right.
Why don't you go there? You'll feel more at home.
52 posted on
06/01/2006 1:32:09 PM PDT by
rightinthemiddle
(Islamic Terrorists, the Mainstream Media and the Democrat Party Have the Same Goals in Iraq.)
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
New Yorkers have not been as supportive of the War on Terror as they should be. It's kinda hard to justify pumping dollars into New York when they don't take it seriously. It's just an excuse for pork barrel spending to them.
To: Buck Ninety-Nine
That Lady happens to be in the state of New Jersey.
58 posted on
06/01/2006 1:37:19 PM PDT by
G.Mason
(Others have died for my freedom; now this is my mark ... Marine Corporal Jeffrey Starr, KIA 04-30-05)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson