Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: katieanna

Nah. Since time immemorial it has been an ancient crown prerogative, and recognized as such. The bastards merely got a diagonal bar on their coats of arms.


13 posted on 06/01/2006 8:13:12 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GSlob

You are right. I do recall the british monarchs having all kinds of extramaritals and out-of-wedlock births.

I do wonder this: this girl is a waitress. I didn't think Albert would take up with "commoners". LOL


15 posted on 06/01/2006 8:15:50 AM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: GSlob
The bastards merely got a diagonal bar on their coats of arms.

-Eric

26 posted on 06/01/2006 8:22:52 AM PDT by E Rocc (Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: GSlob

Exactly. Kings got to openly keep mistresses too.
Funny that they have to hide them these days.


45 posted on 06/01/2006 8:54:10 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: GSlob
The bastards merely got a diagonal bar on their coats of arms.

To the left.

61 posted on 06/01/2006 9:55:32 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson