Both result in deadly force. The law sees it that way, not just me. It takes more training to properly control the deadly force which can come from an animal, as compared to a gun.
The law allows for people to own dogs that can manifest deasdly force, and owners should be responsible for that force when it is misapplied, but I do not see how Liberty is maintained by banning any dog that is properly controlled. Its just that we have a culture which romanticizes the animal kingdom, including dogs.
Aggressive dog breeders who sell their dogs to people who are not competent to handle them should also be held responsible. That way, people would get the training they need and would not purchase such a dog unless they could have the proper conditions for it.
I see no reason to ban any breed of domestic dog but the ownership of WILD Animals, such as WOlf DOg hybrids perhaps should be banned.
You obviously find no irony in requiring training for people who own certain breeds of dogs.
Your own words indicate that you realize that there are dangerous dogs.
We're not allowed to own hand grenades and, there will come a time when certain breeds of dogs will be banned.