Aggressive dog breeders who sell their dogs to people who are not competent to handle them should also be held responsible. That way, people would get the training they need and would not purchase such a dog unless they could have the proper conditions for it. You obviously find no irony in requiring training for people who own certain breeds of dogs.
Your own words indicate that you realize that there are dangerous dogs.
We're not allowed to own hand grenades and, there will come a time when certain breeds of dogs will be banned.
We're not allowed to own hand grenades and, there will come a time when certain breeds of dogs will be banned.
Yes that may be true, but the people will decide,not liberals who want to paint all ( or many) dogs as evil as they did guns, and hopefully those laws can be in force before we get into a cycle of single event driven, knee jerk legislation, as we did with guns, because somebody's aunt was eaten.
I would love to own a Siberian Tiger, but he would eat too many of my neighbors, after he cleaned my land of rabbits and other smaller critters.
We're not allowed to own hand grenades and, there will come a time when certain breeds of dogs will be banned>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No domestic breeds should be banned. And I have yet to see a dog explode and kill a room full of people. Maybe you have.
People who do NOT know how to handle aggressive bredds either need to be trained to handle them, or people should not own them, and breeders should not sell to people who do not know how to handle them.
Just as you do not ban guns, in a democratic republic, you do not ban dog breeds.You train people to handle them.Its called education, and without it, BTW, a democratic republic does not function.
I would love to breed an exploding dog, just feed it lots of beans and pull its tail, BOOOOM!
They would be popular in Iraq and other Muslim countries.You could make a lot of money.
