Name neither or name both. The article speaks to that issue as well as the devastation of false accusations of rape, and shocking statistics about false rape accusations.
1 posted on
05/20/2006 2:18:48 AM PDT by
Jezebelle
To: Jezebelle
Duke comes to mind.
Where would the circus be without a dog to whip?
2 posted on
05/20/2006 3:25:37 AM PDT by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: Jezebelle
4 posted on
05/20/2006 4:16:20 AM PDT by
Alia
To: Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ...
5 posted on
05/20/2006 8:11:36 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Jezebelle
But his real fortune stems from living in Toowoomba, perhaps the only town in Australia where the names of people accused of sex offences aren't published unless they are convicted. Sounds like a fine idea. I would also include Child Abuse under this law.
These are crimes that we as a society find repugnant in the extreme and once an accusation is made public an exoneration is only a partial stain remover.
6 posted on
05/20/2006 8:18:26 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(I am only an evil INTERN. I am still learning.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson