Does "an incomplete sexual assault report" mean that there are tests that weren't done that should have been? I don't see how delays like this help Nifong. It just plays into the idea that he's not acting in good faith, and is trying to hide exculpatory evidence ... like the accuser's possible refusal to allow a tox screen.
GAgal, I wonder if the two go together?
The SA report is incomplete because there is no tox report contained in it?
If she hadn't screamed rape, they would have put her in a cell overnight to dry out and that appears to be what was originally intended.
I still wonder if she threatened the cop with "take me in and I'll say you raped me".
It might just be that THAT is what occurred and the cop was trying to protect himself. Did she do a bait and switch??
Abrams show: Alleged victim not tested for drugs or alcohol, according to defense attorneys.
Well, we may be seeing some toying from the defense. Since Nifong intimated to the press that a date-rape drug was used, and now there's no document turned over to support that, and Nifong said he gave the defense everything, one rationally concludes that not everything was turned over. After all, the suggestion that a date-rape drug was used indicates there is a tox report, but no tox report was forthcoming. Thus, one must conclude that not all documents were turned over. But Nifong said he gave them everything. So, which is it, Nifong? Were you lying about the date-rape drug? Or were you lying when you said you turned everything over? The two statements cannot co-exist in truth.