Yes but the lack of a speedy trial law is the complaint being raised here. I also think many criminal defendents don't want speedy trials because overtime evidence can degrade etc.
The innocent want a speedy trial usually. That is why the constitution promises it to them. On the plus side, if a racists Durham jury convicts on this flimsy evidence, there is certainly a federal issue.
You're right, but that's apparently a general problem in the jurisdiction in question, not something specific to this case. The information at the top of the thread seems to indicate that the defense wanted this case pushed to the front of the court schedule this summer.