Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS

You're right, but that's apparently a general problem in the jurisdiction in question, not something specific to this case. The information at the top of the thread seems to indicate that the defense wanted this case pushed to the front of the court schedule this summer.


99 posted on 05/19/2006 9:07:37 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

The defense said nothing about pushing ahead of anyone. The judge said something about that.

Durham county can not say our cops are too busy to give Miranda warnings and besides we do not Marandize anyone else. Similarly Durham County can not say, speedy trial, we don't give anyone no stinkin speedy trial.

That Durham routinely denies accused speedy trials does not trump the right of any particular person to a speedy trial. That other defendents routinely waive their speedy trial rights does not mean these guys lose their right to a speedy trial.

So the judge can say any hauty thing he wants about not pushing this trial ahead of others. These guys still have a right to a speedy trial.


108 posted on 05/19/2006 9:19:36 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson