Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 05/13/2006 11:52:58 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

New thread here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1631677/posts



Skip to comments.

Rape Accuser Had Photo ID'd Possible DNA Match
NBC CHANNEL 17 ^ | 5/11/06

Posted on 05/11/2006 9:17:59 PM PDT by TexKat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 1,501-1,512 next last
To: SirJohnBarleycorn; maggief; Alia; Howlin; TexKat; OakOak; All

Landon...Mangum?

Okay, sounds strange, but there are hundreds of Mangums in the area...black and white.... xo gave us this clue:

MANGUM, BRIAN, SCOTT
Date Confined Date Released Statute Description Bond Type Bond Amount
4/16/2006 [incarcerated] MISDEMEANOR PROBATION VIOL SECURED $20,000.00






1,101 posted on 05/12/2006 8:58:27 PM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1092 | View Replies]

To: toldyou

Oh, you could be right.


1,102 posted on 05/12/2006 8:59:09 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Church of the Apostolic Revival

That's the one, maggief. They came right out of the box, IMMEDIATELY, with a diatribe in front of 610 Buchanan. I'd hazard to say they might not be too much unlike either NOI or NBP. I heard the diatribe. Major ick. Sure, sure insert Christian word, here, there -- but get on back to Social Justice and the Hatred of Whites and Privileged Males, blah blah.

1,103 posted on 05/12/2006 8:59:41 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: maggief; Howlin; All

I am still reading through the thread but here is my take on what we learn from the reports from the press conference:

1. The Duke Police view that DPD said this case would not lead to much is supported by the actions of the DPD. Why in the world was their not crime scene tape on the door to that bathroom? The only logical reason is the DPD did not believe the woman's statements and saw no reason to preserve the non-crime scene.

2. As others have said, the SANE report is basically meaningless now. So the case now becomes: a flawed ID, a houseful of people who did not witness a rape, DNA that is inconclusive in one case, an ambiguous SANE report.

3. The defense claim that she IDed someone not in Durham at the time. Nifong caught himself here. He rigged the line up, but thought he might get it past a judge by asking her to look at the following pictures and comment on who was at the party, hint, hint. So she picks out three guys, claims that one had a moustashe who did not and claims she saw some other player[s] who were not in Durham at the time of the party. That will be a big subject of cross if this every gets to that stage. Nifong could have avoided this had he found out who was at the party and put them in photo arrays with other non-lacrosse players. At least then had she picked the same three he would have a little something in his favor.


1,104 posted on 05/12/2006 8:59:43 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks, hon!


1,105 posted on 05/12/2006 9:00:14 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: Carling

What company?


1,106 posted on 05/12/2006 9:00:29 PM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1065 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied

the defense would have the right to have the whole report about the DNA read into the record.....if the DA wants to hang on DNA, then he'll hang.....


1,107 posted on 05/12/2006 9:00:30 PM PDT by cherry (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 976 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; bvw; yellowdoghunter

Y'all need to see the replied-to post. Just so you can keep up to speed, since I know you wouldn't want to be behind the curve on this one.


1,108 posted on 05/12/2006 9:01:17 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Did one of the attorneys say that NONE of the team members EVER had a mustache?? And that some of the guys she ID'd were out of state at the time of the party?


1,109 posted on 05/12/2006 9:02:14 PM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

I don't think it will go to trial....and I also think NiFong will be disbarred. Like I said early today, I wouldn't be surprised if the DA has a mild heart attack and disappears (more or less). (The Patches routine). I think we'll see a new DA.....real soon.


1,110 posted on 05/12/2006 9:04:40 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1062 | View Replies]

Comment #1,111 Removed by Moderator

To: cherry

Yep. I do know little Jimmy Hammer is light in his loafers...and Kimberly G. of Fox News, now, was the prosecuter in that case. What a pair...


1,112 posted on 05/12/2006 9:05:32 PM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1100 | View Replies]

To: toldyou

Oh! Maybe! Good job!


1,113 posted on 05/12/2006 9:07:43 PM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Sheets? Dryer?


1,114 posted on 05/12/2006 9:08:20 PM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1102 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
At the same time there'd already been announced that more thorough DNA tests would be done.

Teach you to pay too much attention to press conferences. The "newsies" down there already thought the DNA was going to ID a third attacker ~ that's because they, too, listened too closely to the press conference evidentiary hearings (by both the defense and the prosecution).

Be interesting to see what these tests actually demonstrate when they, themselves, are made public. What we have here, so far, is yet another press conference held by a defense lawyer.

1,115 posted on 05/12/2006 9:08:28 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

Comment #1,116 Removed by Moderator

To: Swanks

I think "Prior sexual history" refers to years gone by. Not ten minutes ago.
______________________________________________

You might think that but you clearly have not seen the full effect that the manhating chorus of Murphy, Grace etal has had on the court system. The ONLY way this probably gets in is if the prosecution claims injury.


1,117 posted on 05/12/2006 9:10:54 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 979 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I'm still wondering where the police chief is in all this.


1,118 posted on 05/12/2006 9:11:44 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Haven't those three you just pinged been siding with the accuser? HA!


1,119 posted on 05/12/2006 9:12:02 PM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1108 | View Replies]

To: toldyou

That's interesting....Wasn't there a $20,000 bond on our rapee that NiFong wrote off?? Wonder if the dates match!


1,120 posted on 05/12/2006 9:12:21 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 1,501-1,512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson