Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

Paramount doesn't own Cruise. His dealings with them are on a picture by picture basis. It is folly to suggest that they are intentionally sabotauging their summer blockbuster to gain the upper hand with him in future dealings. If this flic fails these folks will be out of a job. If it succeeds wildly then they will gladly pay Cruise whatever he wants next time.


12 posted on 05/10/2006 7:43:50 AM PDT by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911
If this flic fails these folks will be out of a job. If it succeeds wildly then they will gladly pay Cruise whatever he wants next time.

I don't think it will "fail". But I do think they have manipulated expectations. Look at the headlines: "$48M opening is a failure". Doesn't that strike you as odd?

Cruise has a sweet-heart deal in Hollywood and he does need to re-negotiate this. The Wall Street Journal has covered this.

The studio wants to make money, and it wants to have more power than the actors. The publicity for MI:3, as I see it, will allow the movie to be profitable, but decrease Cruise's power. That's a win-win (but not for Tom).

35 posted on 05/10/2006 7:53:42 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson