Looks like it COULD be a hair. The other night all the scuttlebutt on TV was we hear there's a hair, etc.
But, that begs the question.. Why didn't the SBI ID the hair in the first go round? That's a big question. The SBI spokesman said when they were doing the first round that they had done testing, similar to what was required in the Duke case, Hundreds of times. He said that it was nothing new to them.
Was the hair found in an evidence bag after the first round? That's problematic. Testing a hair is the about the easiest testing they do. Hmmm.