Looks like it COULD be a hair. The other night all the scuttlebutt on TV was we hear there's a hair, etc.
But, that begs the question.. Why didn't the SBI ID the hair in the first go round? That's a big question. The SBI spokesman said when they were doing the first round that they had done testing, similar to what was required in the Duke case, Hundreds of times. He said that it was nothing new to them.
Was the hair found in an evidence bag after the first round? That's problematic. Testing a hair is the about the easiest testing they do. Hmmm.
This certainly explains Nifong being overly confident and cocky the last 2 weeks.
Protect the Bill of Rights - the Defense lawyers have ample footage of that house looking like a wreck. The outside of that place was a dump, the curtains looked like they were from 1938. I'd think that place was a DNA factory.
Nothing is making sense though. Of all the people that went to class with these guys and ate Pizza at the same joints, professors and activists at Duke, coaches - no one has come forward (could've collected 75 grand from a tabloid) to say that suspect #3 had a moustache?
If this was a legitimate ID, why the moustache comment? If the suspect had been going to class (if he didn't he'd be ineligible to play in short order) and playing Lacrosse games where people from both teams (hom e and visiting have camcorders)- it seems almost certain someone would've seen the moustached man. Especially since he would stand out on a team that didn't them.