1 posted on
05/06/2006 6:23:22 PM PDT by
Perdogg
To: Howlin
2 posted on
05/06/2006 6:23:44 PM PDT by
Perdogg
(entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem)
To: Perdogg
In the meantime these boys lives are on hold while the stripper will continue as a victim with her free ride thru school. Sickening.
To: Perdogg
Well now that was an "in your face" act. What happened to speedy trial?
4 posted on
05/06/2006 6:37:06 PM PDT by
TheSpottedOwl
(If you don't understand the word "Illegal", then the public school system has failed you.)
To: Perdogg
i wonder how long a time can satisfy "speedy trial" requirement ?
5 posted on
05/06/2006 6:37:49 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(I never put my foot in my mouth...I shoot that sucker off long before it gets anywhere near my mouth)
To: Perdogg
Nifong said he doesn't expect the case to come to trial before next spring...until after the general election in November to be sure. He doesn't want his head handed to him by the defense till he gets his 4 year term started.
8 posted on
05/06/2006 8:36:45 PM PDT by
Lawgvr1955
(You can never have too much cowbell !!)
To: Perdogg
To: Perdogg
In CA they define "speedy trial" not by statute as a certain number of days for a certain offense, but as the number of days elapsed for some percentile of cases (upper 75th?) that actually come to trial.
The court asks you at your arraignment if you waive your right to a "speedy trial", which is still a longer period than you think it would be. If they have the same option in NC I can't imagine that the two boys would have done that.
48 posted on
05/07/2006 4:45:40 PM PDT by
jiggyboy
To: Perdogg
I thought the defendants had a right to a speedy trial?
The kids should make the prosecutor present the case sooner rather than later.
59 posted on
05/07/2006 9:37:59 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson