Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief

Maggie,

I know there was a photo of a watch released, but I am pretty sure Dan said there is another where you can see the face clearly. Unless this one is blurred on purpose by the defense for some reason, because there is noway Dan could be talking about this photo, you cannot see anything.


753 posted on 04/28/2006 7:10:47 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 732 | View Replies ]


To: snarkytart

That's the picture that was released.

Here are all the images:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1617550/posts?page=1013#1013

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1617550/posts?page=1015#1015


758 posted on 04/28/2006 7:16:58 AM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies ]

To: snarkytart
Unless this one is blurred on purpose by the defense for some reason, because there is noway Dan could be talking about this photo, you cannot see anything.

I don't know if there are other photos of time pieces that are better than the one we see as 12:00:29, but in this photo when zoomed in you can definitely see one of the hands point to what appears to be the 12:00... If it was straight up 12:00 then the two hands are indistinguishable...

It doesn't look like this photo has had the watch face photoshopped... If it was, it was done by someone much better than whomever photoshopped the AV's pics... I don't see the obvious smudges on this photo that appear on the others...

860 posted on 04/28/2006 9:01:19 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson