Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: snarkytart
Unless this one is blurred on purpose by the defense for some reason, because there is noway Dan could be talking about this photo, you cannot see anything.

I don't know if there are other photos of time pieces that are better than the one we see as 12:00:29, but in this photo when zoomed in you can definitely see one of the hands point to what appears to be the 12:00... If it was straight up 12:00 then the two hands are indistinguishable...

It doesn't look like this photo has had the watch face photoshopped... If it was, it was done by someone much better than whomever photoshopped the AV's pics... I don't see the obvious smudges on this photo that appear on the others...

860 posted on 04/28/2006 9:01:19 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies ]


To: darbymcgill

Are you saying you believe the times on the accuser's photos appear to be altered? Based upon the framing of the time? Why would the times of the accuser need to be changed? If these photos were indeed taken with a cellphone, those photos can be retrieved from Nextel, AT&T or whomever... And of course the photos will be presented as proof of actual times.. I'm sure the prosecution and defense have this information already... :)


1,255 posted on 04/28/2006 8:14:57 PM PDT by boldtruth (Alteration...?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson