Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lacrosse players face old charges (Nifong retaliates against Duke Lax)
News & Observer ^ | April 25, 2006 | Benjamin Niolet and Joseph Neff

Posted on 04/25/2006 2:34:48 AM PDT by abb

DURHAM - District Attorney Mike Nifong plans to reinstate misdemeanor charges against a half-dozen Duke lacrosse players, saying a March 13 party where a woman reported a rape broke the deals that the players made with prosecutors.

Nifong's decision could affect players who, before the party, had entered agreements in which prosecutors would dismiss the cases if the players performed community service and stayed out of trouble for six months or a year. Among the first to have his charges reinstated was David Evans, one of the team captains who lived at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd., the site of the party in which lacrosse players hired two women from escort services to dance. One of the women told police that she was raped by three men in a bathroom.

Two players, Collin Finnerty, 19, and Reade William Seligmann, 20, were charged last week with first-degree rape, first-degree sex offense and first-degree kidnapping. Their attorneys say the men are innocent.

On Monday, an attorney for Seligmann filed a motion seeking information that would help attack the credibility of the woman, the only person, according to the defense filing, who says a rape occurred. The motion seeks information about the woman, including criminal charges, mental and emotional problems the woman has suffered as well as social services, probation, child protective services and victim's advocacy records.

Today, Finnerty is due in a Washington court where prosecutors in an assault charge are considering whether to revoke a deferred prosecution agreement similar to those affecting other players in Durham.

According to court records, 16 players were charged in the past three years with misdemeanor charges in Durham including noise violations, public urination and alcohol violations. The deals placed the men on probation for either six months or a year.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsobserver.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; moronicda; nifong; vengefulidiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,241-1,260 next last
To: abb

McFayden's email indicates he was most likely there.


301 posted on 04/25/2006 11:51:55 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I'm still hummin' that old Pringles song myself...The link is on the right.


302 posted on 04/25/2006 11:52:35 AM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: abb
There's a difference between who we know was there and who can be proved to be there. For example, I expect when the photos are released they will prove at least a few more players were there.
303 posted on 04/25/2006 11:52:36 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: abb

Seligmann is in at least one of the time-stamped
photos.


304 posted on 04/25/2006 11:53:15 AM PDT by maggief (And the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: maggief

As is the now embarrassed fellow described as "passed out with his shorts somewhat down".


305 posted on 04/25/2006 11:54:35 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane
Collin Finnerty looks like my youngest son. This travesty is making me sick.

And we can never stress to our children enough that it is possible that: If You Lay Down With Dogs. You’ll Get Up with Fleas

306 posted on 04/25/2006 11:54:53 AM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

Logical, I agree. But will that hold up in court? The prosecution has to PLACE them at the scene, either via forensics or ID. Which reminds me, did any of the players do fingerprints? Oh. And just one more thing (in my best Colombo immitation, LOL) forensics doesn't indicate a time that someone was there, does it?


307 posted on 04/25/2006 11:56:06 AM PDT by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

It's now the fashion amongst a lot of kids to walk around with their shorts somewhat down with their boxers hanging out on top. Unless the waistband is around his knees I'm not sure this is significant.


308 posted on 04/25/2006 11:57:06 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

LB, the defense don't have to release any more photos. That would be self incrimination. Which is why the investigators wanted the cameras and hard drives....


309 posted on 04/25/2006 11:57:38 AM PDT by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

What is likely to happen is this:

1. The DC case will be continued until the NC case is over.

2. If he is convicted in NC, then he gets serious time and I doubt DC bothers with him.

3. If he pleads out in NC, then DC may go ahead. This is fair, you dont give diversion to people who already have records.

4. If charges are dropped in NC, then DC may or may not go ahead. If it looks like charges were dropped only because the witness would not testify, DC may go ahead. If it looks like he was cleared, then DC probably lets the matter drop.

5. If he is found not guilty in a trial in NC, DC probably lets the matter drop.

But it is not nothing, the DC case would give this young person a criminal record which he would not have had otherwise.


310 posted on 04/25/2006 11:58:28 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: abb
That was kind of my point - the difference between now what is publicly proven and what could be proved given the evidence we know about.
311 posted on 04/25/2006 12:00:00 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Seligmann is in at least one of the time-stamped photos.

Is he the only one? Maybe that's why the defense allowed the cab driver to ID him.

312 posted on 04/25/2006 12:02:26 PM PDT by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Did you get to the AP Video site. If so type Duke in the video search box. And then you will see the video of Kim that you can select.

As far as pringles, I am eating salt and vinegar pork skins at the present. I love these things and I'm trying to ward off the evil islamic terrorist.

313 posted on 04/25/2006 12:03:02 PM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: JLS
It is nothing compared to what he is facing in NC is all I was saying.

He will have an arrest record now regardless of the DC issue.

This false allegation has ruined many lives, and yet the accuser will walk away as the victim...very sickening.
314 posted on 04/25/2006 12:04:57 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: abb

When the defense first started showing the photos to news media, it's been routinely reported that the photos show additional players seated in a rough horseshoe around the dancers. These photos have not been released but simply shown to media but apparently could be used to ID additional players.


315 posted on 04/25/2006 12:05:15 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01
That's some pose ... it's missing Monica.



This is more appropriate ...

Hat tip: dead
316 posted on 04/25/2006 12:06:02 PM PDT by maggief (And the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

Yes, I recall that. Does the defense have to turn them over to the prosecution if they're subpoenaed? Would that be self-incrimination?


317 posted on 04/25/2006 12:07:12 PM PDT by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: abb

I think the prosecution has to share with the defense everything it has but not vice versa. But I'm just guessing.


318 posted on 04/25/2006 12:08:32 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: abb

You want talking out of an ass? Listen to this. Howlin said up in the thread that Nifong fixed a 2005 traffic ticket for AV.

Wonder if they have a "thing"?

How's that for ass talkin' LOL!


319 posted on 04/25/2006 12:09:06 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane
I'm sure the defense lawyers love that video tape.

Have em ping me, I got it on TIVO...

320 posted on 04/25/2006 12:09:12 PM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,241-1,260 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson