Posted on 04/19/2006 4:37:00 AM PDT by MindBender26
Breaking overnight from Chris Cummo at ABC GMA:
Case against at least one Duke defemdant unraveling fast.
Defendant Seiligman went to bank ATM while rape supposedly happening.
12:02 Time stamped photos show girl arriving. Girl leaves, comes back, call friends on cell phone does other things. 12:19 Seiligman calls cab dispatcher 12:24 Seiligman takes cab to bank miles away, uses ATM card (photos show it is him.) 12:42 after walking back to dorm, Seiligman uses security card to enter dorm. Does not leave.
Also, Seiligman was never interviewed by cops. DA seeking reelection simply took "Dancers" word that he raped her.
I believe it is the only DNA test they can do on hair IF there is no follicle attached.
http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/apps/offender/offend1?DOCNUM=0801264&SENTENCEINFO=yes&SHOWPHOTO=yes&numtimesin=2
He might be required to rule the ID inadmissable. If so, there goes the case; not that there was one to begin with. Nifong could also kiss his re-election goodbye at the same time.
What is that test on hair where the maternal DNA is needed? It was used in Westerfield and Peterson, IIRC.
I found it...........
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1607267/posts
".........The retired trucker who lives in Durham said he saw his daughter the day after the reported attack, but she didn't say anything was wrong. She even left her car at the house for several days because he said she didn't want to drive it................"
Why would she do that? All I can think of is that she was driving the car and may have been in a fender bender & since her license was suspended she wanted it off the street.
OR
maybe she needed the money from the Duke job to make a payment? Was the repo man looking for her?
Just speculating, but it would go to motive if (again, speculation!) she needed that money for car payments.
I saw something on her.. Let me look at that link ..
Thanks
Thanks! I thought it was odd that she wanted to leave her car...didn't want to drive it. Any unsolved hit and runs around Durham during that time?
All misdemeanors.
I think (or was told) her license is suspended.
But, this brings the Boyfriend/Pimp into the whole thing, IMO.
It's good for the defense. He was with her (according to the Father in a recorded statement) in the time where she couldn't recall any details and he, most likely, drove her to the police station. I think that brings his credibility into the whole thing. It's not unreasonable for anyone to think that she discussed with him what the police may want to know or what she was going to tell them. If he has a long and infamous rap sheet, and he was getting a cut of her work (i.e., has influence over her) and spent the intervening 27 hours with her (from the time she was released until she told the police any details), well you can see where I'm going
I
It's the same.
What was she doing while waiting for the accuser?(30 minutes). Lax players couldn't have been too out of control or she wouldn't have stayed.
WHERE was she when accuser is being attacked? If outside, WHY? If inside, she should have heard something!
She lied about the 911 call; she lied about picking up the accuser wandering on the street; now she can't imagine the accuser making up a story..Is she kidding? What took her so long to get to Krogers?..
I want Kim's name!!!LOL /RANT
In the state of Washington, a private citizen doesn't have to swear out a warrant to arrest someone who has committed a felony. They can just arrest the individual. i'm going to arrest the CJ of the state SC on MAy 9, 2006, at 1;30 pm. Told that corrupt SOB to his face 3.5 years ago I was going to put him in prison if it was the last thing I do.
Usually the police instigate a case through serving an arrest warrant they obtain themselves from a judge. That did not happen here. Looks like the D.A. is way out on the end of a limb by himself.
Did the DA swear out the affidavit on which the arrest warrant was based? If so, he is a sitting duck for a 42 US Code 1983 complaint if he doesn't get a conviction. He might as well give everything he owns to these two kids.
I wonder if the cops refused to go to the judge for a warrant because they didn't think there was probable cause. If so, the DA is in even bigger trouble.
Sorry, no
You are so right. I would feel sorry for her because I think she was minding her own business and got caught up in this mess, but she's lying, so she is gonna get what she deserves.
That definitely gets my attention, even if it was on BO. It's a little third-hand but it goes to a point that is central to how I have been seeing this thing.
Funny you should mention that "investigation is moving along" phrase. One of our local TV reporters used exactly that phrase today getting me quite agitated. I thought it was ~her~ phrase. My thought was, yea, it is "moving" in the sense of being stirred/shaken/splashed around in. But I don't believe it is "advancing!"
A few nekkid women. One was even decent looking.
" They don't like that ORAL charge. I think they wish they never said it.. "
I reread the Probable Cause Affidavit and there are contradictions within two sentences.
Adam, Bret and Matt ".. forcefully held her arms and legs and raped and sexually assaulted her annally, vaginally and orally."
" ..she claimed she was clawing at suspect's arms."
How does one claw while your arms are forcefully being held ?
Nifong's demonstration on the Abrams Report showed full movement of her arms.
I just googled kim/stripper/durham....
Now I have to make sureI get rid of all cookies & cache--kids will wonder what the hell Mom does on the 'puter, LOL!
A General Discharge changes to Honorable after six months provided the recipient "keeps his/her nose clean" for that six-month period in civvy life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.