Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ChessMan
That this is considered a crime, today, shows how disoriented American society has become. Marriage used to be understood as permanent consent to the needs of your spouse--at least to the extent that one was able to satisfy them.

The humoring of the Feminist lunacy goes on and on. Where it stops nobody knows. That it has destroyed much that was once sacred--including a sense of privacy in one's most intimate moments, in addition to family values that go back to the dawn of recorded history--is beyond argument.

For an answer to Feminism:

The Feminist Absurdity.

William Flax

5 posted on 03/30/2006 1:14:44 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ohioan
Marriage used to be understood as permanent consent to the needs of your spouse--at least to the extent that one was able to satisfy them.

lol...was that before or after Noah's flood?

6 posted on 03/30/2006 1:17:48 PM PST by Dark Skies (" For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. " Matthew 6:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Ohioan
Marriage used to be understood as permanent consent to the needs of your spouse--at least to the extent that one was able to satisfy them.

OMG.... someone should slap you....Preferably into this century.

8 posted on 03/30/2006 1:20:02 PM PST by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Ohioan

"Marriage used to be understood as permanent consent to the needs of your spouse--at least to the extent that one was able to satisfy them."

Uhhhh........

Well, I'm not sure whether male or female FReepers are going to tear into you first, for that little tidbit of idiocy.

Seriously, that's sick.


12 posted on 03/30/2006 1:40:22 PM PST by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Ohioan

No one has a right to sexual contact with another without the affirmative consent of the other. I believe that is not something reasonable people would differ on.


27 posted on 03/30/2006 2:23:33 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Ohioan

I understand what you mean about the marriage contract, but I don't think anyone signs on to allow another person to "have sex with them" in their sleep...

It seems... immoral... to me, to do that to someone, especially someone you are supposed to love, respect, and protect (as a husband).

I dunno...


33 posted on 03/30/2006 2:55:12 PM PST by confem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson