Skip to comments.
'Love child', mother lambaste Big Unit (Randy Johnson refuses to acknowlegde his daughter)
MSNBC ^
| 3/29/2006
| NBCsports.com
Posted on 03/29/2006 12:48:46 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: JennysCool
It's not chump change, but it is lower middle-class income for the child of a multi-millionaire.
41
posted on
03/29/2006 1:19:39 PM PST
by
altura
(A proud member of the 45 percent.)
To: JennysCool
". . . for the privilege of knowing her."
KNOWING HER!!??
Ummmm.... the relationship seems to have been a bit closer than that, unless, of course, you're speaking King James biblically.
Creepy.
42
posted on
03/29/2006 1:19:43 PM PST
by
Jedidah
To: misterrob
I'd definitely agree with you on that.
I admit for the average person like myself it seems as though the girl's mom is getting a rather large amount of money (for the record I'm a woman). However she's been the only parent that young woman has ever known. And that big jerk certainly makes enough to be able to afford those payments.
43
posted on
03/29/2006 1:20:04 PM PST
by
cjshapi
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Uh, if he doesn't sue to get the $97K returned, any lawyer that could fog a mirror would sue for future support, etc., based upon the "implied" intention to support beyond the age of majority.
44
posted on
03/29/2006 1:20:11 PM PST
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Just in time for opening day! ;-)
45
posted on
03/29/2006 1:20:28 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Some people like to dash it out, but they just can't take it!)
To: petitfour
But he's a really good pitcher. lol Yes he is! But always a bit of a head case too.
46
posted on
03/29/2006 1:20:34 PM PST
by
Rummyfan
To: JennysCool
I would consider refusing to see your biological daughter, ever!, a case of "abandonment", even if he paid some child support.
Returning her a card without any writting, just but signed with "Randy", like in some third person. What a total jerk. Be a man. Not some 14 year old boy.
47
posted on
03/29/2006 1:20:42 PM PST
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
48
posted on
03/29/2006 1:21:49 PM PST
by
Jedidah
To: Rummyfan
To: altura
Even though she may have done it for all the wrong reasons, she deserves big money for having sex with anyone that ugly.
You may have a point.
To: Lizavetta
Man, what trailer did that chaw stagger out of?
51
posted on
03/29/2006 1:26:01 PM PST
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Rummyfan
I said that so I could have a reason to dis my ex. But for what she did, I wouldn't doubt it. haha
52
posted on
03/29/2006 1:26:16 PM PST
by
chemicalman
(Many have skeletons in their closets. In New Orleans, we have skeletons in our attics.)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
They don't call him "The Big Unit" for nothing...
53
posted on
03/29/2006 1:26:56 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(I Just Wasn't Made for These Times)
To: Lizavetta; altura
Randy "The Big Unit" Johnson may be ugly, but so was John Holmes.
54
posted on
03/29/2006 1:27:38 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(I Just Wasn't Made for These Times)
To: Rummyfan
he's just one of thousands of stories of pro-athletes who treat their out of wedlock or from ex-marriage children like this.
Randy makes 97K for throwing a couple innings of baseball. What an ass to treat your daughter like this.
55
posted on
03/29/2006 1:27:54 PM PST
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: petitfour
Agreed!
56
posted on
03/29/2006 1:28:20 PM PST
by
Rummyfan
To: Rummyfan
So what? It's HIS money! He's laid out the green for 16 years. And from what I've read here, Moms and the kid want college tuition and a car, which I have a hunch weren't included in the child support agreement. Funny that she no longer wants a relationship with him, but she still wants his money, and more of it.
57
posted on
03/29/2006 1:32:35 PM PST
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: cjshapi
And that big jerk certainly makes enough to be able to afford those payments So, you are advocating that he be required to pay an extra stipend for services not required or taken because "he can affor it"? I don't see where he is trying to end the $60K/year support, but only the $575/month day-care payments. Pay-because-you-can-afford-it sounds awfully socialist to me.
58
posted on
03/29/2006 1:35:18 PM PST
by
MortMan
(Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
To: altura
$5,700 a month for 16 years IS big money: almost a million one.
59
posted on
03/29/2006 1:35:44 PM PST
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: cjshapi
What is this. "From each according to his ability. To each, according to [her] needs"?
60
posted on
03/29/2006 1:37:04 PM PST
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson