Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Skull discovery could fill origins gap
Yahoo (Reuters) ^ | Fri Mar 24, 11:02 AM ET

Posted on 03/24/2006 11:47:46 AM PST by The_Victor

ADDIS ABABA (Reuters) - A hominid skull discovered in Ethiopia could fill the gap in the search for the origins of the human race, a scientist said on Friday.

The cranium, found near the city of Gawis, 500 km (300 miles) southeast of the capital Addis Ababa, is estimated to be 200,000 to 500,000 years old.

The skull appeared "to be intermediate between the earlier Homo erectus and the later Homo sapiens," Sileshi Semaw, an Ethiopian research scientist at the Stone Age Institute at Indiana University, told a news conference in Addis Ababa.

It was discovered two months ago in a small gully at the Gawis river drainage basin in Ethiopia's Afar region, southeast of the capital.

Sileshi said significant archaeological collections of stone tools and numerous fossil animals were also found at Gawis.

"(It) opens a window into an intriguing and important period in the development of modern humans," Sileshi said.

Over the last 50 years, Ethiopia has been a hot bed for archaeological discoveries.

Hadar, located near Gawis, is where in 1974 U.S. scientist Donald Johnson found the 3.2 million year old remains of "Lucy," described by scientists as one of the greatest archaeological discoveries in the world.

Lucy is Ethiopia's world-acclaimed archaeological find. The discovery of the almost complete hominid skeleton was a landmark in the search for the origins of humanity.

On the shores of what was formerly a lake in 1967, two Homo sapien skulls dating back 195,000 years were unearthed. The discovery pushed back the known date of mankind, suggesting that modern man and his older precursor existed side by side.

Sileshi said while different from a modern human, the braincase, upper face and jaw of the cranium have unmistakeable anatomical evidence that belong to human ancestry.

"The Gawis cranium provides us with the opportunity to look at the face of one of our ancestors," he added.


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: crevolist; godsgravesglyphs; missinglink; origins; stillmissing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-449 next last
To: Junior
It's amazing how many Luddites show up just to ignore the evidence.

There is no refusal to accept technological change here, simply a calling for more concise proof from the scientific field before something is touted as "virtual fact".

In response to your statement:

It is amazing how many gaps there are if science has so much "evidence".
121 posted on 03/24/2006 4:24:26 PM PST by BedRock ("A country that doesn't enforce it's laws will live in chaos, & will cease to exist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: John 6.66=Mark of the Beast?
" Dna does not evolve does it? It only mutates into a disease?"

Into a disease? That's a new one.
122 posted on 03/24/2006 4:25:11 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

DNA mutates into toenail fungus, placemarker.
123 posted on 03/24/2006 4:27:15 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

" just like a Whale is not an animal, but a fish."

A whale is an animal. So is a fish. A whale is not a fish.


124 posted on 03/24/2006 4:27:51 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
The fact is that man can have mammal characteristics but not be an animal,

Humans not only have "mammal characteristics", they are mammals. All mammals are animals, therefore humans are mammals.

just like a Whale is not an animal, but a fish.

This statement is incorrect for multiple reasons: Fish are animals, and whales are not fish.
125 posted on 03/24/2006 4:28:04 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Me too. I'd like to know if the cranium has eight bones just like mine and every other person living in Ethiopia today.

Bones of the cranium:

Frontal
Parietal
Occipital
Temporal
Sphenoid
Maxilla
Nasal
Zygomatic
Mandible
Ethmoid
Lacrimal
Palatine
Vomer
Inferior nasal concha

Ear:

Maleus
Incus
Stapes

126 posted on 03/24/2006 4:29:32 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Perhaps Fester is suggesting that he and "every other person" in Ethiopia are lacking many of the bones that you listed.


127 posted on 03/24/2006 4:31:00 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Humans not only have "mammal characteristics", they are mammals. All mammals are animals, therefore humans are mammals.

Cue Nelson Muntz.

= )

128 posted on 03/24/2006 4:32:49 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
"What's "zinthanropus"? Google gives no hits.

- Try Zinjanthropos.
- Zinjanthropus. It was spelled wrong, being in a creationist post.
- Try Zinjanthropus.

My colleagues have all asked good questions, but a more important one would be 'Have you tried Hare Krishna'?

129 posted on 03/24/2006 4:33:38 PM PST by b_sharp (Unfortunately there is not enough room left here for a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

When tools are found in the immediate vicinity of bipedal hominids it is a fairly clear sign the bones are those of people. Or do Jane and Koko communities abound throughout the planet?


130 posted on 03/24/2006 4:33:46 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
a Whale is not an animal, but a fish.

Can you show us the gills on a whale?

By the way, you still haven't gotten around to telling us how many legs a locust has, whether a hare chews its cud, whether bats and birds are the same, and where the evidence for a world-wide flood is.

131 posted on 03/24/2006 4:35:18 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Junior
"It's amazing how many Luddites show up just to ignore the evidence."

But they do such a bang-up job!

132 posted on 03/24/2006 4:35:34 PM PST by b_sharp (Unfortunately there is not enough room left here for a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Wow, a diagram!

Now there is some real proof.

LOL!

133 posted on 03/24/2006 4:36:13 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman; Fester Chugabrew

Give Fester his due. It wouldn't surprise me if his cranium was indeed eight bones.


134 posted on 03/24/2006 4:37:35 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Bones of the cranium:

Occipital
Parietal (2)
Frontal
Temporal (2)
Sphenoid
Ethmoid

Does this "missing link" have all of these, just like my skull and those of everyone else who lives in Ethiopia?


135 posted on 03/24/2006 4:39:40 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch
"Would these scientists describe three DIFFERENT species? Of course they would! And it would ALSO be ridiculous."

Probably not. You see, determination is based on quite a number of different attributes of the skulls. Just because you would find it impossible to recognize their placement in the series does not mean that scientists would.

136 posted on 03/24/2006 4:40:39 PM PST by b_sharp (Unfortunately there is not enough room left here for a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John 6.66=Mark of the Beast?
Dna does not evolve does it? It only mutates into a disease?

incorrect. most mutations are irrelevant, neither positive nor negative in consequence, indeed imperceptable in the phenotype of the mutant organism.

heritable mutations add up over generations, leading to differentiation inside a population. many of these substantially mutated subgroups are selected against by environmental and other factors, but some are not.

such accumulated mutation through multiple generations sometimes eventually leads to divergent descendant strains - this is called speciation through imperfect replication and (natural) selection, aka "the theory of evolution".

137 posted on 03/24/2006 4:42:50 PM PST by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

The two pectoral fins on a fish are a clear indication that fish are our bipedalar ancestors. Just think how many millions of years it took for that unintelligently undesigned process to work itself out!


138 posted on 03/24/2006 4:44:01 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

"just like my skull and those of everyone else who lives in Ethiopia?"
When did you move to Ethiopia? And when did their skulls have different numbers of bones than everybody else?


139 posted on 03/24/2006 4:44:01 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

not really new - just an abbreviated version of the old "loss of data/mutation only damages" fallacy.


140 posted on 03/24/2006 4:44:12 PM PST by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson