Posted on 03/20/2006 6:07:07 PM PST by mathprof
via Drudge
Stop the tape!! Charlie Sheen, credible?? This guy, right?
Need I say more? Actually, yes...roll tape!
...in questioning the official story of 9/11 and calling for a new independent investigation of the attack and the circumstances surrounding it.
Oh my, how original...how 2002...questioning what's been proven...amazing. No, not amazing...stupid!
Speaking to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network, (who??) the star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen elaborated on why he had problems believing the government's version of events.
What's the problem, Charlie? Ashamed of letting people know about all your other "epic" roles, such as in Scary Movie 3 and 4, or Major League 1 and 2, or how about Hot Shots and Hot Shots, Part Deux? Maybe Loaded Weapon 1 isn't something to be proud of? How about Men at Work? Aren't you pretty careful about parsing your list of credits?
Yup, very "credible", indeed. /sarc
That's right. It was all an evil plot. Thost people never died. Al Quaeda and his BUDDIES are really our friends, quite fit for tea. Please send out the invitations...
""It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions."
LOL...
All of those are pretty decent films.
Not on the same level as "V for Vendetta", but enjoyable none the same.
Sorry, Charlie, but the second anyone joins this particular "army", s/he is eliminated from the list of credible people. Go back to acting.
Ummmm . . . when did we start communicating in DUmmie-speak here? Will I need to learn Ebonics too?
fo shizzle.
the thing tha tworries me is this:
google 911 and see how many consipracy sites come up...kids doing assigned reports on 911 will believe these conspiracies
good post. i think youre right
I didn't say they were BAD movies...just that I find it ironic that, in order to establish "credibility", either he (or more likely the writer of the story,) decided that those parts of his body of work were better not mentioned...
Are the DUmmies saying Sheen has lost it, or that he has it right?
I haven't seen the Sheen thread over there, but people have gotten tombstoned (banned) for disagreeing with similar sentiments before over there.
The nutjobs over at http://www.911blogger.com/ need to get their FReeping asses reemed out...
I was unaware that there was such a thing as a professional suicide terrorists.
bttt
Take the poll at CNN's Entertainment website (scroll down, right side)
"Are the DUmmies saying Sheen has lost it, or that he has it right?"
They all agree. They are going on about their theory of WTC7 going down without being hit and the angles at which the buildings fell..yada yada...
Ok...... please tell me for WHAT purpose would our government do this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.