Sounds to me like she WAS too intoxicated to consent.
I do not generally believe that when two teens consent to participating in sexual relations with one another that one of them, usually the guy, should go to prison.
But I reiterate, sounds like she was too intoxicated to give consent.
You are getting the two charges mixed up. The intoxicated charge was acquitted from video evidence. I am assuming the video evidence was very strong to show that the 17 year old accusing them of rape was full of it.
The other charge was the 15 year old oral sex, which had consent. the 15 year old was not intoxicated.
Maybe he was too intoxicated to resist!
well we dont know without looking at the tape but they gave plea deals to the others invovled and the jury found him not guilty on that charge so ill take their word on it