[gogoman]

You are getting the two charges mixed up. The intoxicated charge was acquitted from video evidence. I am assuming the video evidence was very strong to show that the 17 year old accusing them of rape was full of it.

The other charge was the 15 year old oral sex, which had consent. the 15 year old was not intoxicated.

[trubluolyguy]

The other charge was the 15 year old oral sex, which had consent. the 15 year old was not intoxicated.

---

Then this kid should not be in prison.

This is, as my 16 year old daughter just said, "retarded."

[stormlead]

... and apparently, the 15 yr old was *ahem* 'servicing' a number of the youths. If you want to stick someone in jail, it should be her parents/guardians- or better yet, keep the government out of this.

This isn't some 40yr old molesting a child, its a bunch of teenagers whose morals are way out of wack- something a jail sentence won't fix.