|
Posted on 03/03/2006 9:39:16 AM PST by Reborn
How 'bout this little quote from the article:
It does, however, mean that in theory, with the help of a conversion kit that someone will surely write, a Mac could run Windows.
ping
Pinging for Apples
I'm gonna wait another year and let them work out the kinks, then replace my G4 Powerbook with one of these beauties.
LOL, you is fast!
They failed to mention that they run HOT. Not that it is a bad thing, but it is hard to cut heat with the dual core processor.
Just don't expect a "cool" laptop like most centrino based PC's have become.
That is the main reason that I'm holding onto my PBG4. I remember laptops of old that I could've fried an egg on. No thanks! Hopefully, down the road, these MacBook's will run cooler too......I hope.
"It does, however, mean that in theory, with the help of a conversion kit that someone will surely write, a Mac could run Windows."
Makes perfect sense considering that Microsoft is the majority stakeholder in Apple.
That would be "no". Microsoft owns no part of Apple - they've long since sold off all the stock.
Sorry, that is false. Microsoft has never held a majority interest in Apple, nor even a voting interest. Microsoft did have approximately 150 Million dollars worth of Apple preferred stock at one time (an investment required by a court settlement which Apple won a a settlement against Microsoft) but that has long since been sold.
Now, if you specifically mean "Stake"holder rather than "Stock"holder, meaning they have a non-financial interest in Apple's survival because Apple is their main research division, seeing how they somehow "borrow" everything Apple develops... then you might have a point.
I stand corrected....thanks for the clarifications.
It's interesting that nobody points out the most important difference between the Macbook pro and its predecessor.
The Macbook uses a dual processor setup which means that if you're working on something, say loading up email or a giant iphoto library - you'll still be able to browse the web or do other things with a very minimal speed penalty. Right now, my brand new 17" PowerBook G4 tends to stall when doing something CPU-intensive.
This means the Macbook will lead to a truly revolutionary improvement in productivity for someone who likes doing a lot of things at the same time, like me. If you liked the dual processor G5 PowerMac, you'll love the MacBook Pro.
I plan to buy one as soon as they come up with a 17" version (love that display!)
D
Oh, good got in on this thread before Hank posts some of the same old sh*t.
My wife's G3 iMac is going dead. She asked, "Do you want to replace your G4 Powerbook with a new one, and I'll take your old one?"
I said, "No. Not yet."
She fainted.
IBTH
(In before the Hank)
I would've too, lol. I can't live without my PBG4! I was using a TiBook when I bought my new Powerbook. My hubby, always a Dell user, started using my old TiBook, and ended up getting rid of his Dell, heehee. He's hooked now. ;-)
It's interesting that nobody points out the most important difference between the Macbook pro and its predecessor.
The Macbook uses a dual processor setup which means that if you're working on something, say loading up email or a giant iphoto library - you'll still be able to browse the web or do other things with a very minimal speed penalty. Right now, my brand new 17" PowerBook G4 tends to stall when doing something CPU-intensive.
This means the Macbook will lead to a truly revolutionary improvement in productivity for someone who likes doing a lot of things at the same time, like me. If you liked the dual processor G5 PowerMac, you'll love the MacBook Pro.
I plan to buy one as soon as they come up with a 17" version (love that display!)
D
14 posted on 03/03/2006 1:00:46 PM MST by daviddennis
It works by "nicing" all tasks except the one you are looking at. I have a 1 Ghz 17" PB and I can run a Mandelbrot benchmark and
You might want to look into a product called CPU Speed Accelerator 2.11.
b'shem Y'shua
Nice is a Unix command to lower dispatching priority.
a Quicktime movie. If the Quicktime is in the foreground it never stutters.
The Mandelbrot benchmark takes longer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
