Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quantum computer works best switched off
NewScientist ^ | 22 February 2006

Posted on 02/23/2006 3:58:12 AM PST by S0122017

Quantum computer works best switched off

Even for the crazy world of quantum mechanics, this one is twisted. A quantum computer program has produced an answer without actually running.

The idea behind the feat, first proposed in 1998, is to put a quantum computer into a “superposition”, a state in which it is both running and not running. It is as if you asked Schrödinger's cat to hit "Run".

With the right set-up, the theory suggested, the computer would sometimes get an answer out of the computer even though the program did not run. And now researchers from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have improved on the original design and built a non-running quantum computer that really works.

They send a photon into a system of mirrors and other optical devices, which included a set of components that run a simple database search by changing the properties of the photon.

The new design includes a quantum trick called the Zeno effect. Repeated measurements stop the photon from entering the actual program, but allow its quantum nature to flirt with the program's components - so it can become gradually altered even though it never actually passes through.

"It is very bizarre that you know your computer has not run but you also know what the answer is," says team member Onur Hosten.

This scheme could have an advantage over straightforward quantum computing. "A non-running computer produces fewer errors," says Hosten. That sentiment should have technophobes nodding enthusiastically.

Journal reference: Nature (vol 439, p 949)

From issue 2540 of New Scientist magazine, 22 February 2006, page 21


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: quantum; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: JoeSixPack1

"OK, brain hurts, need coffee......."

Try just smelling it.


61 posted on 02/23/2006 7:01:49 AM PST by strategofr ( Davidson: "...50 or more [like Foster]..murdered [by Clintons]." Hillary's Secret War, Poe, p. 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

Yep, I think Dem's are using the non-working quantum politics. They're believed to work better than traditional politics. Of course, occasionally, that theory meets the hard non-quantum world.


62 posted on 02/23/2006 7:49:09 AM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble
this is not a bad explanation...

(Wild tangent alert!)

From that Wikipedia article:

The quantum Zeno effect takes its name from Zeno's arrow paradox, which is the argument that since an arrow in flight does not move during any single instant, it couldn't possibly be moving overall.
I have always thought that this is a surprisingly silly paradox. Motion is inexorably related to time, and clearly so. The fact that the paradox depends upon the restraint of "any single instant" exposes it as just a ridiculous play on words. By definition, nothing moves "during any single instant"!

In fact, the use of the word "during" in that phrase is contradictory in and of itself. If no time passes, there is no "during".

63 posted on 02/23/2006 7:49:50 AM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: S0122017

The shadow would the quantum nature of the particle allowing it to exist in multiple states at the same time
and the shadow, not being an actual shadow, allows feedback back to the particle altering it. >>>>>>>>>

I knew that 8 0 )


64 posted on 02/23/2006 8:01:25 AM PST by RipSawyer (Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: S0122017

Somewhere between The Onion and modern physics.

I present you the Bistromatic...


65 posted on 02/23/2006 8:03:32 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
Although we would have to expose our brain to the articles in some way

Or to something entangled with the article. But you knew I was going to say that...

66 posted on 02/23/2006 8:04:40 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
I didn't read this article but I remember what it says.
67 posted on 02/23/2006 8:05:21 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MilesVeritatis
The political analogy might be a kernel of truth and logic getting into a hard leftist's head.

Not really. This is something that could actually happen...

68 posted on 02/23/2006 8:05:44 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
Knowing something about computer science, I find the above statement to be techno-babble.

That's the problem with quantum physics, none of it really makes any sense, but somehow it works.

"Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it." -- Niels Bohr

69 posted on 02/23/2006 8:05:45 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BooksForTheRight.com
Any science that claims that a "cat" can be alive and dead at the same time is invalid.

The cat thing is more of a mental exercise to help people understand quantum mechanics, since so much of it is counter-intuitive.

70 posted on 02/23/2006 8:07:04 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
That would why so many post here without reading the articles.

;-)

71 posted on 02/23/2006 8:07:25 AM PST by uglybiker (Don't look at me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Perhaps you don't understand the question? This requires Deep Thought...


72 posted on 02/23/2006 8:07:40 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Mind Boggles, but extremely intrigued!!

Now that's the right attitude to take. Know from the beginning that you will be confused -- very, very confused. I was when I started looking into this (I had a Ph.D. math friend who was trying to explain it to me, WHOOSH right over my head). I still am quite often.

73 posted on 02/23/2006 8:09:40 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MrNeutron1962
Fixed your typo...

OK Baby Duckling, Turn off the ignition switch and make get like your you're getting making out.

74 posted on 02/23/2006 8:10:22 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


75 posted on 02/23/2006 8:13:12 AM PST by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pointsal
Can I study by placing the book under my pillow?

It worked for Edgar Cayce...

76 posted on 02/23/2006 8:13:40 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

LOL, mine neither... You think it'll happen if I keep waiting ? Actually there might be another 'quantum' effect... that of my wife banishing me to the couch without actually doing it.


77 posted on 02/23/2006 8:16:02 AM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 21stCenturion
( N.B. No actual cats were harmed during the production and discussion of this model.)

Or was that all cats were harmed. I can never keep it straight..


78 posted on 02/23/2006 8:16:30 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
...where's the "OFF" switch?

Any attempt to turn it on will turn it off.

(Proving it's female...)

*ducking* and running for cover...

79 posted on 02/23/2006 8:19:10 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

Good one...


80 posted on 02/23/2006 8:19:38 AM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson