Posted on 02/08/2006 5:09:49 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
by Mark Finkelstein
February 8, 2006 - 08:00
It wouldn't have been more than a couple years ago that had headlines invoked Britney Spears in a "lap" controversy, images of graphic goings-on in the Champagne Lounge might have come to mind.
But time marches on, and Britney-the-new-mother is now caught in a lap-gate of an altogether different sort, after photos of her were snapped driving her car with her four-month old son in her lap rather than secured in a car seat. In the latest development, according to this LA Times article, a Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy went to her Malibu home on Tuesday "to collect information for child welfare investigators" in connection with the matter. For the record, Spears says she was feeling hounded by paparazzi and drove off with the baby in her lap to escape them.
The morning shows worked themselves into a collective lather over the horror of it all, with the sentiment best summed up by CBS Early Show co-host Rene Syler, who, interviewing a child safety expert, emoted: "every time we look at that picture, it's just so, so scary."
Pluh-eese. Sure, kids should be strapped in a car seat in the back. But just a generation or so ago, an image of a parent tooling around with junior in her lap might have evoked cooing sounds from the person sitting in Syler's chair. The Andy Griffith Show meets Leave it to Beaver.
But today, in our therapeutic society, Britney's gaffe, if that's what it is, merited national news coverage. At one point at the beginning of the 7:30 AM half-hour, ABC, NBC and CBS were simultaneously airing a segment on the matter.
In a world where every day untold numbers of terrorists are plotting to kill as many men, women, and yes, little children as possible, where are the MSM's priorities?
Amen!!
The real story here is that she was driving an SUV.
omg, isn't that child abuse?
See post #28
And remember how the saying goes:::"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone"
I can understand that it may not really warrant accusations of abuse, but I don't buy her story. She looks completely relaxed, with just one hand on the wheel, and with the window partially down. It just doesn't look like a panic-stricken scene to me.
Look, I don't give a flip whether Britney or any other adult wants to wear their seatbelt or not. But I do respect the law requiring parents to keep their small children in car safety seats in the back seat. Kids shouldn't have to pay with their lives because they've got wreckless idiots for parents.
If your parents aren't putting you in a safety seat (as they should) then I think you would prefer them to be "wreckless".
yeah and you point is what ?
There are plenty of people on this forum who see nothing wrong with the state sticking its nose in every aspect of your existence. The see nothing wrong with "reasonable restrictions" on gun ownership. They see nothing wrong with seat belt laws, helmet laws, etc.
I never admired her for her brains.
LOL! Imagine that, I must have had wreck on my mind!
It had never been about that. We are not a libertarian anarchy. We had relative freedom. But when the country was founded, we still had slavery. Slavery is not freedom. We had a lot more rules in 1776 than we do today. Cursing in public could put you in jail back then. Until 1964, black people couldn't even ride in the front of a bus in most states in the South. Want to buy gas on Sunday morning? Fat chance in most Southern states. I couldn't even choose my own school in 1972.
Where do we draw a "minding our own business" line? Kids are taken from their parents all the time for neglect and putting them in danger. With today's idiot driver, having a baby on your lap is extremely dangerous.
My father, granddad to my two young ones, never really understood the point of infant carseats.
And then a friend of his had a newborn in a car, hit an icy patch, went off the road and flipped the car over. The infant was strapped in, hanging upside down, completely safe. Others in the car were significantly tossed around.
My father could then imagine what would have happened to the four month old, had it not been properly restrained in a car seat.
Everyday that kid is exposed to a greater risk of having those two bags of silicone explode in his face, but I don't see the nanny state busy bodies worrying about that! Get a life. Butt out of other people's business and worry about your own family.
Hell, I'm just surprised she actually knows how to drive, wasn't smoking crack, and wasn't on the cell phone!
LOL
Ooooops....I did it again. |
Look, here's the problem.
It's not YOUR business, it's not the Government's business.
Until we get BACK to that mind set, your Master's in Washington DC will continue to create little controlling laws like this until your and my freedom's are GONE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.