Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
Re: The building structure.

The center core was a huge load bearing stuctural component. Why wasn't it left standing as the floor slabs pancaked (breaking their moorings -- a perpendicular attachment far more vulnerable to vertical moments of inertia than a vertical column would be)?

111 posted on 02/01/2006 9:38:32 PM PST by Anthem (One can not lie their way to the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Anthem
The center core was a huge load bearing stuctural component. Why wasn't it left standing as the floor slabs pancaked
110 stories worth of vertical steel column standing by iteslf?

Vertical steel columns ONCE tied together via the floor 'joists' to the external load-bearing vertical steel columns?

I'd like to see the bending 'moment' at the base of those vetical beams; they would have to be built of 100% Unobtainium, which is at LEAST 1000 times stronger than diamond.

120 posted on 02/01/2006 9:47:11 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: Anthem
The center core wasn't capable of standing on its own . . . its stability was based not only on its own strength, but on its connections to the exterior frame.

Think of it like the sides of a truck that strikes a low overpass. The walls seem solid when the trailer is intact, but when a large section of the roof is buckled they suddenly lose their ability to stand up, and they collapse outward when that lateral support is lost.

145 posted on 02/02/2006 3:19:20 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson