This guy just more or less published the agenda of the 9/11 group we had a thread on, yesterday or the day before. It's rubbish.
They really hope to play to the ignorance of people. Not hot enough to melt steel... pffft. Doesn't need to melt.
Some start with the motive, asking: Who is benefitting from the "War on Terror"? Benefit is an odd word to use regarding a war that has no forseeable end, but there are parties who benefit. A proper investigation whittles down the list of suspects who are then tracable to possible motives.
Another problem is, who's going to do the investigative work. The US Government has already produced the very investigation that doesn't stand up to reason. And that's where Jones, and others with his qualifications. Back in the day, FR was good at this sort of thing.
Not again!...
I've heard this crap a thousand times before.
Peddle it somewhere else.
Rubbish. Utter rubbish.
IBTZ
Sure you are.
Back in the day, FR was good at this sort of thing.
Ah, yes, the good old days of Michael Rivero.
Crackpot stuff.
I thought it was Mayor Nagin's fault.
This dude really needs to find a life
Hey, guess what . . . believe it or not, that's exactly how tall buildings collapse -- controlled demolition or not.
"But there cannot be genuine resolution as long as such critical information remains concealed."
We saw the 'critical' information. Case solved.
There are a couple of legitimate questions here. For example, I've long suspected that the design of the buildings was one of the contributing factors in their collapse. The external lattice frame that was used in their construction was an innovative design element back then, and I suspect the buildings would have stood a much better chance of surviving the impact and fire if they were constructed with a standard internal column/beam frame.
There's no investigation since the root cause of 9/11 is because of Clinton's inaction against terrorism suring his administration.
All this other planned demolishing nonesense is just that.
Back in the day, Michael Rivero was a regular poster on FreeRepublic.
When he turned into a jew hating kook, he was banned. He's still out there if you want to find out what really happened.
This author writes for Common Dreams, a commie web site. 'nuff said. It's crapola.
Jet fuel burns at 2,200 degrees and it was not all destroyed in the fireball. The South Tower fell first because the impact of the United 767-200 was lower, (thus putting more weight on the damaged sections) hit at a much higher speed, and hit at an angle rather than head on like the American 767-200ER did the North Tower.
• Why did building WTC-7 fall, though no aircraft struck it? Fire alone had never before caused a steel skyscraper to collapse.
There was a show on the History Channel that explained this in great detail. IIRC, WTC-7 had a unique structural design due to the fact it was sitting atop a Con-Ed substation and all it took was for a few steel beams to become week and it went BOOM.
• Why did all three buildings collapse largely into their own footprints -- in the style of a controlled demolition?
Many large buildings are designed so that when the time come for them to be destroyed, they will fall into themselves.
• Why did no U.S. military jet intercept the wayward aircraft?
They tried. We don't have aircraft that are capable of hypersonic flight just yet. It takes time to fuel, arm, takeoff and fly to the target. Had Flight 93 not crashed, armed F-16's were on course to intercept and destroy it if necessary.
• Why has there been no investigation of BBC reports that five of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were alive and accounted for after the event?
Simply put, because the BBC is full of crap and you're full of crap for believing this dribble.
That's a long time to wait for a chance to evaluate the purported truth.This train came off the tracks in the second paragraph; so successful have the charlatans in the conspiracy industry been in propagating a nearly complete ignorance of the well-known facts ...
A physicist, an economist, a professor of philosophy, a "conspiracist", and Wayne Madsen, who writes paranoid stuff for Daily Kos and prisonplanet.com. Madsen recently wrote an article stating that his "sources" in the Vatican told him that John Paul II thought George W. Bush might be the anti-Christ.
These people are much like the goofballs who thought a team of Arabs brought down the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City.
People of all stripes and education can be conspirazoids. They will not accept the "official" version of anything, no matter how well documented or researched, and no matter how many structural engineers say the same thing about how, for instance, a building can fall when a large aircraft filled with jet fuel damages the inner core.
Ignore these people. The last thing we need is to feed the nuttiness of somebody like Alex Jones.