9/11 ATTACKS Avoiding the hard questions

Miami Herald ^ | Feb. 01, 2006 | ROBERT STEINBACK

[bnelson44]

Where's the footage? If this report is so easily debunked, let's see the evidence.

Sorry, there is no evidence of any wires or bombs. zippo.

[sinkspur]

If this report is so easily debunked, let's see the evidence.

That's not the way it works.

First, let's see this guy's evidence.

[Incorrigible]

I mean reeealllly! Sheesh!

[onyx]

I think I'm starting to see dead people...lol.

[justshutupandtakeit]

I just finished watching the National Geographic program about 9/11 and it is made clear what happened and who did it. The forces behind it worked to bring it about for almost ten years. They were centered in Pakistan and led by Osama Bin Laden. They are still drawing the Haters of the earth and, with the assistance of the Domestic Enemies of the US continue to fan the flames of hatred against the US.

It is a war which may last decades being the final stage of the 1400 year old attack on the West from Islam. Michael MOOer crap is only going to strenghten that attack.

These questions are not that profound.

[Howlin]

Tourist Guy!

[Alberta's Child]

The external frame provided more redundancy, but it also provided more exposure to damage from external forces. I also suspect that the enormous size of the floor slabs and long horizontal distance between the core and the external frame made these floor slabs the weakest part of the structure. In a traditional building frame, it may be possible for individual sections of floor slabs to fail without bringing the entire building down -- or to at least cause the building to collapse in a slower fashion.

[_Jim]

Where's the footage? If this report is so easily debunked, let's see the evidence.

It's in a bottle on Funk and Wagnall's porch not to be opened 'til high noon mid-year in the year 3030 ...

Seriously, you have NEVER read any of the peer-reviewed reports and analysis by REAL structural engineers have you?

[Howlin]

It was on the news every single day and night for four or five months.

[ladyinred]

Oh PLEASE!

[onyx]

ROTFLMAO! Haven't seen that one for years!

[kenth]

ah haha.. I forgot all about the twenty. People were running around folding their twenties and showing them to each other with knowing looks of grand conspiracies. Just what the conspiracy was they couldn't really say.

[SteveMcKing]

Oh and best of all -- JFK was Bill Clinton's greatest inspiration.

No surprise the lying, socialist, pot-smoking, womanizing, gay-loving freaks.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Just ask yourself how would a hundred story building fall but straight down. All the weight is above a very small area. You think something is going to shove it to one side?

[Anthem]

--et fuel burns at 2,200 degrees

Only under ideal conditions. Jet fuel is kerosene. Inside a jet engine designed to turbo compress the fuel and adding the right about of air, it burns that hot. Uncompressed and out in the open air it does not. Moreover, after the initial flame ball with burned up within minutes, the evidence that the fire was burning much cooler due to air starvation is presented by Jones. Further, there are eyewitnesses who report that the fires had died down.

Read the report.

[Alberta's Child]

Angular momentum isn't enough to make a building that size fall sideways. In order for a building to collapse any way but on itself, there must be sufficient lateral force to move the building's center of gravity far enough horizontally that it is outside the "footprint" of the building. I can't think of anything other than perhaps a 1,200-foot tidal wave that would be capable of exerting that kind of force on a structure that weighs about 500,000 tons.

[Howlin]

[Howlin]

Oh, well, it gets our juices running!

[COEXERJ145]

I know far more about aviation than you ever will. Jet fuel burns at 2,200 degrees. You really need to have your head examined or better yet, get a brain transplant.

[Howlin]

I don't know about the 20 dollar bill, what's that?