Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sun wants Linux on T1
TechWorld ^ | 27 January 2006 | Patrick Thibodeau

Posted on 01/30/2006 8:11:48 AM PST by N3WBI3

Sun is keener than ever to port Linux to its new multicore T1 chip, even if it's not expected to happen for six to nine months.

The company has made T1 servers available to Linux developers and is working with unnamed Linux distributors to develop the port.

And while a port may be completed this year, it will be a while before Linux on T1 appears in production environments; application certification and support will be needed as well.

Mike Splain, chief technologist for Sun’s Scalable Systems Group, believes Linux running on the company’s eight-core chip will open up new options for users who want to run Linux applications in a scaled-up system. "Having multiple operating systems [for the T1] broadens its appeal,” he said.

Linux can already run on UltraSparc chips, but there has been little interest in doing so to date. Splain attributed that to technical limitations Linux developers face when building ports. By open-sourcing the engineering specifications, Sun is ensuring that Linux developers now have “the exact same documents that we would use internally,” he said.

Moreover, working with the T1 will be easier because it includes a hypervisor, which is similar to a BIOS on an x86 chip, and developers will be able to write to the hypervisor’s application programming interfaces. The hypervisor will also eventually include virtualisation capabilities, he said. The specifications are available online at www.opensparc.net.

Sun’s decision last month to open-source its UltraSparc chip specifications follows the release early last year of the Solaris source code as open-source. In both cases, for the UltraSparc chip as well as the Solaris operating system, Sun is encouraging developers to find new ways to use its systems.

Sun’s open-source push is already yielding results. For instance, earlier this month, Blastwave, a Canadian Solaris open-source development firm said it had ported Solaris to IBM’s Power chip.

Karl Freund, vice president of IBM Systems Group, called that move “another signal that [the Power chip] has cast a long shadow over Sun’s confusing array of processors. It would seem that even Sun and their remaining customers acknowledge the value of our Power innovations.”

Karen Anaya, chairwoman and CEO of Sparc International, hailed the plan to open-source the T1. She believes the specification release will boost Linux’s capability to run on UltraSparc and said it will draw third-party support. Anaya also said her group expects a T1 port to Linux. “We’re excited about it,” she said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: linux; opensource; sun; t1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2006 8:11:50 AM PST by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3; ShadowAce; Tribune7; frogjerk; Salo; LTCJ; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; clyde asbury; amigatec; ...

OSS PING

If you are interested in the OSS ping list please mail me

2 posted on 01/30/2006 8:14:51 AM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Solaris...dying?


3 posted on 01/30/2006 8:15:04 AM PST by fzx12345 (Three lefts don't make a right; they invent one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
unnamed Linux distributors to develop the port.

Im going to take a guess from left field and sy they are working with Novell. Suse has always had a larger harware profile than RedHat...

4 posted on 01/30/2006 8:22:58 AM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fzx12345
I think its more like Sun dying then just their OS. Linux will allow them to reach the entry and mid level server market better. They may not make money on their trademarked OS, but at least they can sell the proprietary hardware and keep production cost down for it. Its the same as what IBM did, but many years late. I really don't see Sun surviving on its own for much longer.
5 posted on 01/30/2006 8:53:52 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neb52
I'm still not entirely sure what the allure of running Linux on Sun hardware is. Solaris rocks on their own hardware an is extremely stable.
$ uptime
 12:34pm  up 1221 day(s), 20:44,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.02
$

Granted, the above is an internal webserver without a hell of a lot of load on it, but 1221 days is good in anyone's book.

I can understand making Solaris available on Intel hardware, as it allows folks who work with Sun hardware to have an inexpensive way to have Solaris available on a workstation without the expense of a full-blown Sun Server.

Why would anyone run Linux on production Sun hardware?

6 posted on 01/30/2006 10:38:43 AM PST by zeugma (Muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
How much does a entry level Sun box run?

I'm assuming they are trying to offer the hardware to a broader market then what they are able to obtain with running their OS on. On any forums concerning Unix/Linux I rarely see Sun's name mention. Usually its AIX or one of the BSD variants. If I was Sun I would see that as a big marketing flop. Plus Solaris 10 requires a lot more in resources then any of the Linux variants.

I see this as the same as IBM embracing Linux a few years back. It insures that IBM hardware continues to get used in the entry and mid level server market, which helps keep the manufacturing cost of the PowerPC chip down. Otherwise they would have be relegated to being just a high end server manufacturer.
7 posted on 01/30/2006 11:01:42 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neb52

Note: I looked at Sun's website and the prices are about $1,000 higher than comparable IBM Servers.


8 posted on 01/30/2006 11:05:54 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neb52
84821RU
84821RU IBM xSeries 206 P4-2.8GHz/512MB/36.4GB U320 SCSI/48x/Gigabit NIC - Tower. New Retail 3 year warranty , In stock!!
$780.00

At $1000....Sun has a problem!!!


9 posted on 01/30/2006 11:15:33 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neb52
Left out reference:

ComputerGiants.com.

10 posted on 01/30/2006 11:17:33 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neb52
I see this as the same as IBM embracing Linux a few years back. It insures that IBM hardware continues to get used in the entry and mid level server market, which helps keep the manufacturing cost of the PowerPC chip down. Otherwise they would have be relegated to being just a high end server manufacturer.

That could well be. I'm not sure how well that will work out though. Have you ever tried to install Solaris on an Intel box? I did several years ago and it was disappointing to say the least. You basically ended up with an OS. Even such basic tools as gzip had to be installed separately. Kinda reminded me of what you end up with once you install a Microsoft OS. I don't know if that is still true, but for low-end systems, it was definitely easier to install Linux as so many of the really useful tools were bundled with it. On the plus side, you can now install KDE and/or Gnome for Solaris. CDE was the Worst Window Manager Ever.

11 posted on 01/30/2006 11:21:12 AM PST by zeugma (Muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

I had some experience with Solaris 9 and recently tried to load 10, was told I needed at least 400MB of RAM to run the graphic installer :( (I have 256MB in my test box).


12 posted on 01/30/2006 11:45:31 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I was comparing the IBM PowerPC based server like the p5 505 to one of the UltraSPARC 111i based servers. Proprietary against proprietary. I did see one of the models to be better, but the others looked to be higher for number of processors/memory/SCSI Hard Drives. Otherwise Sun has AMD based models that are competitive and should be able to run Linux already. I just think to be able to continue the prorietary line of CPUs that they feel the need to expand what OSes run on it.
13 posted on 01/30/2006 11:54:23 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Why would anyone run Linux on production Sun hardware?

Some people hate anything other than Linux. They are quite fanatical about it, and are typically referred to as "zealots". They put Sun down at every opportunity, ignore all of Sun's contributions to open source as hypocritical, even accuse them of attacking Linux along with SCO and Microsoft. Surely you've seen them, impossible to miss these days.

14 posted on 01/30/2006 4:50:36 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
You know, noone missed you when you were gone for the past month.

Due to the extremely large number of inaccurate and idiotic posts you've presented to this point, and your tendancy to encompass the very definition of the word "troll" on this forum, you are no longer relevant. Thanks and have a nice day.

15 posted on 01/30/2006 8:09:12 PM PST by zeugma (Muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

I encourage everyone to follow your link, and see how many times I have to correct others on here, including yourself multiple times.

In this particular case, you questioned why some people would do stupid things, and I gave you the answer. Are you claiming I was incorrect?


16 posted on 01/30/2006 8:40:44 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
It's way past time that I have felt any desire whatsoever to converse with you about anything at all. Go harass someone else.

Due to the extremely large number of inaccurate and idiotic posts you've presented to this point, and your tendancy to encompass the very definition of the word "troll" on this forum, you are no longer relevant. Thanks and have a nice day.

17 posted on 01/30/2006 8:59:24 PM PST by zeugma (Muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

You're not going to call me a troll and dance off into the sunset pal. I'm here correcting all the BS that is constantly posted, in fact it hasn't even been but a few short months ago you were apologizing on here for attacking me out of the blue and being completely wrong in your assesment. Follow your link to my history and find it if you forgot.

As for my posts on this thread, if you think I'm wrong then try to refute it. But you haven't proven me wrong yet, and until you do, I'm obviously not a troll. I'm a guy that cuts BS down to the nub, whether you like it or not.


18 posted on 01/30/2006 9:12:38 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Perhaps you'll hear it if it is in a bigger font...

Due to the extremely large number of inaccurate and idiotic posts you've presented to this point, and your tendancy to encompass the very definition of the word "troll" on this forum, you are no longer relevant. Thanks and have a nice day.

19 posted on 01/30/2006 9:32:11 PM PST by zeugma (Muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Typical, increase the font when your BS is exposed, and calling me a troll is obvious BS since you can't ever refute anything I say. Witness this little exchange, you sling a few names around and increase your font, LMAO.


20 posted on 01/30/2006 9:54:49 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson