Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PORN-AGAIN STAR (actor Stephen Baldwin, born-again Christian, acts against nabe sex shop)
NY POST ^ | 1/18/06 | BILL HOFFMANN and HASANI GITTENS

Posted on 01/18/2006 8:08:47 AM PST by Liz


PEEPIN' STEPHEN: Stephen Baldwin, a born-again Christian, plans to snap photos of license plates of people going into a Nyack store once it's a sex shop, then publicize their names. Photo: Djamilla Rosa/WireImage.com

Actor Stephen Baldwin has his shorts in a bunch over a sex shop opening near his estate in Rockland County.....

The least-known of the Baldwins, Stephen, a born-again Christian, parked himself outside the Route 59 location in Nyack and took snapshots of construction workers walking in and out of the building.

Once the smut shop opens in a few months, the 39-year-old star of "The Usual Suspects" plans to photograph patrons' license plates and run their names in the local newspaper to shame them from ever returning.

His beef is that the store is within a quarter-mile of the community's residential area. "This is a thoroughfare that I drive by many, many times as do college kids, mothers with their children," Baldwin said.

He said he and other residents protested at Nyack planning-board meetings and asked the owner, Quintus Algama of Hollis, Queens, to choose a more distant location, but he wouldn't listen.

In addition to selling sex toys and porn, the shop will also feature video booths where patrons can watch hardcore flicks in total privacy.

"These guys want to do this business, God bless 'em. That's between them and God. They'll have to deal with that for eternity. But the people of Nyack do not want this location where it is," Baldwin said.

Baldwin said he's already enlisted the help of dozens of students of nearby Nyack College who'll be at the store the day it opens to protest.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: communitystandards; porn; porngood; stephenbaldwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-386 next last
To: Pure Country

Don't think that was my point. You called people who enter a porn store perverts. What I am saying is that, who are you to judge them? Who is Stephen Baldwin to "record" people who go into the store? It's their lives, let them live it.


361 posted on 01/19/2006 6:28:37 AM PST by ToddBush ("The only reason you're conscious is that I don't want to carry you" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd

If you think having your photo taken is harrasment, you'd make a poor celebrity, LOL...


362 posted on 01/19/2006 6:37:48 AM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Doormat? Not engaging in sin to force or coerce others to ones will is not being a doormat.

My question about Lazarus had nothing to do with faith, it had to do with pointing out that Christs actions are those of the Lord, and God has told us what is our responsibility and what is not, and he has also told us what duties are to be left to him. Vengence is the Lords, if he seeks vengence upon those who change money in his house, that is indeed his right... that does not mean that it is you place to do so.

You are not exposing anything, these activists are not exposing anything. The customers of this business are not doing so in secret, and the business is not operating hidden in some cave... all they are doing is hypocritical and sinful actions attempting to harrass and intimidate others to their will.

The bible is very clear about how to treat the sinner, and that is to assume they are ignorant of the fact they are sinning and inform them of their sinful ways.. if however they still choose to sin, it does not say for us to take it upon ourselves to force them to stop, or harras them or intimidate them or otherwise castigate them.


363 posted on 01/19/2006 6:40:31 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Sorry, but that argument does not wash. Harrassment is harrassment, and its immorral and sinful behavior.

Taking it upon yourself to expose the sins of others to the world, is not your place... What was it that Jesus said about that?? Something I recall about those without sin casting the first stone?

I am absolutely amazed that so many supposedly "Christian" people wholesale ignore the actual words of Christ and his father when attempting to justify their hypocrisy.

The bible is quite clear about how a believer should deal with a sinner... and what their moral obligations are. And nowhere does it say you shall intimidate and harrass and coerce them from their path. Inform them of their sin, or suffer responsibility for them... but it does not say it is your job to drive them from their path.

Islam takes that belief system... obey the edicts or die or be punished in this world.... Christ did not advocate that sort of thing at all.


364 posted on 01/19/2006 6:47:31 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

I have a soft heart, I believe what they are planning to do they do with good intentions, but that the methods they choose to do it with shows ignorance of the true teachings of Christ, and they will use his name to justify it.. which ultimately is hypocritical... and sinful action. Intentions do not negate the realities... What is it they say about the road to hell being paved with?

Bascially I have informed them of what I believe to be their sin, to cleans myself from responsibility before God for it, if they in the end choose to engage in it.

The end of the day, sin does and will always exist in this world.. the idea that you can drive sin out of the world is foolhearty... for all that leads to is an authoritarian state. You change lives and the world by changing minds.. not by harrassment or intimidation or coercion.


365 posted on 01/19/2006 6:54:51 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Taking a photo is not a sin, but to take that photo with the clear and intendended purpose of harrassment and intimidation most certainly is... and that is exactly what they are planning on doing.

Having sex isn't a sin.. having sex with someone you aren't married to or is married to another is... Trying to narrow the scope of the reality to make an argument, doesn't fly. You cannot seperate action from intent before the eyes of the Lord.


366 posted on 01/19/2006 6:57:00 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Wow if that's your idea of harassment and punishment, I can guess where you stand on the definition of torture; is a bright lite to tough during interrogation? Must milk and cookies be provided?

The Police have told him it is alright to publish the photos in the paper! He cannot call them names or label their activity as anything other than just a patron of the store.
If they are ashamed of going there they can wear trench coats and dark sunglasses, LOL....

If the Emperor wears no clothes, is it harassment to stare?
367 posted on 01/19/2006 7:03:54 AM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave
Dave, please reread my post, I specifically said that everyone has a right to take pictures in public. I have a problem with invading law abiding citizens privacy by posting their names in the newspaper. I noticed that you are/were in the Air Force. Do you think it would be acceptable if someone stood outside of the shoppette and photographed the folks who purchase their porn on base then posted it in the base newspaper? Remember kids can go in the BX and shoppette and there are porn mags right there on the shelves.
368 posted on 01/19/2006 7:05:27 AM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd

Well, no one is going to be upset about their photo at the PX. I don't think porn should be sold there either. It is up us to clean up our acts, we are all sinners, and we sometimes need help. Baldwin may help some people remember that God sees everything we do.

I think Baldwin is just trying to keep his community clean, how's that for intent?


369 posted on 01/19/2006 7:14:03 AM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Dave,

You can keep trying to mix apples and oranges, but it does not fly. First you wish to talk about sin, then you want to talk about it in a legal context. Harrassment is harrassment, intimidation is intimidation whether it fits in the legal criteria is not a matter of sin/morality. They are not interchangeable. It is wholey clear what the "protestors" intent is, and that intent is not Christian in the least, even if it is legal.

As to torture, and morality or Warfare, that is an entirely different ball of wax, and to presume that you know my stand on a completely disparigent topic, as an attempt to undermine my stand on this one, shows that you either are rather ignorant or lazy on the intellectual matter being discussed.

These people are going to do whatever they heck they want to do.. .regardless of the word of the Lord... just as the patrons and owners of the store are going to do. So be it.. my only complaint is that those who claim to be doing the protesting claim that they are doing the actions they are because they are following the teachings of Christ.. when clearly their intent and actions are not remotely following those teachings.

Now, from a purely practical non religious standpoint, the protest will happen, it won't have any effect, other than to draw even more attention to the place by the very kids that they claim to be protecting.


370 posted on 01/19/2006 7:25:37 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Again no one is upset about the photo. It's the invasion of privacy when publishing their names that's the issue. Whatever Baldwin's intent he does not have the right to invade a citizen's privacy. Let's just hope no one kicks him in the nuts like his brother did to a photographer.


371 posted on 01/19/2006 7:28:31 AM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Apples vs Oranges:

Legaly, Baldwin has the right to photograph and publish, you agree.

Moraly, Baldwin has the right to try and protect his communities standards.

Each of us has to decide what we should do, I support Baldwin.


372 posted on 01/19/2006 7:29:31 AM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Baldwin has the right to photograph. He doesn't have the right to publish anyone's photograph with the intent to disparage that person's character. He will be sued. If you are so supportive of Baldwin's tactics, why are you not out there photographing and publishing photos of adult store patrons in your area? If it's legal as you claim, what's stopping you?


373 posted on 01/19/2006 11:38:07 AM PST by RTINSC (There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: arasina

Thank you. I had this epiphany driving back from Louisiana one night when I found myself getting all lovey just outside of Hope. Of course, the front end of the Duster did need alignment and the u-joint was bad, so I first I thought it was just the car. After the rearend fell off the Duster a few days later (when I was doing about 80 down I-40), and I had to use the Nissan, the same thing happened while I was cruising down a construction zone near Burns Park.

Then it hit me EUREKA! It was the roads. I called the highway department and told them what I figured out but they told me they already knew it and most folks seemed to like it just fine. They also hit me with a gag order which forbids me discussing it in Arkansas.

parsy, who figures the hwy dept can't figure out who I am.


374 posted on 01/19/2006 11:57:48 AM PST by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

A bunch of Missionaries over the centuries sure have though it was Christ thru them that actually did the heavy lifting....be careful about that line of attack, remember we sometimes" entertain angels unaware"!


375 posted on 01/20/2006 6:01:39 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Liz; JerseyHighlander

I live about 20 minutes from this town. There are two fully nude clubs on this same strip. I wonder why Baldwin doesn't target them.


376 posted on 01/20/2006 11:45:02 AM PST by jmc813 (John Shadegg for Majority Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz; JerseyHighlander

Now that I think about it, there is also a store on that same strip that sells nothing but marijuana paraphenalia (my friend told me about this). Funny little town that Nyack is.


377 posted on 01/20/2006 11:47:25 AM PST by jmc813 (John Shadegg for Majority Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

I'm more disturbed Baldwin lives that close. Why doesn't he go back to his native habitat on LawnGuyLand. There's a Guido Nature Reserve somewhere out in Riverhead.

It might be time to d/l some hi res movie stills of his naked ass and plaster them around Nyack.


378 posted on 01/20/2006 2:52:43 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: RTINSC

They aren't trying to put one in my neighborhood, or anywhere NEAR my neighborhood. We have zoneing where I live that prevents it. No alchohol sales near schools either, because MOST people want to protect families!


379 posted on 01/21/2006 9:19:53 AM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

So, you're OK with restricting adult businesses to certain zones as determined by local ordinance? This is the best way to deal with legal businesses that many find objectionable (or dangerous to your family, as you claim). Moral crusaders and vigilantes should devote their efforts to stop illegal activities where real crime exists. We are a nation of laws. Work to change the laws if you feel so strongly about something.


380 posted on 01/21/2006 12:35:55 PM PST by RTINSC (There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-386 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson