There's so much here, I don't even know where to start.
Call it a target-rich environment.
To: CSM; JTN; VRing; Gabz; freepatriot32
To: elkfersupper
"You better watch out," said Detective Lt. Thomas Michael.
Translation: Arrogant control freak pr!ck.
3 posted on
01/03/2006 6:37:00 PM PST by
jdm
(QOY "I'd hit it. Then I'd turn it over, praise Allah, and hit it again." Lazamataz on Osama's niece.)
To: elkfersupper
It's good to see that the cops are on the watch for Democrat Underground Idiots...
4 posted on
01/03/2006 6:37:01 PM PST by
mikrofon
(Dems Under the Influence)
To: elkfersupper
failure to drive rightI bet they don't read too good, either.
5 posted on
01/03/2006 6:37:07 PM PST by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: elkfersupper
Even though city police officers made only one drunk-driving arrest after stopping more than 1,000 motorists at a sobriety checkpoint late last week, they called the effort successful.
.1%. I guess that is pretty good efficiency if you work for the government and you are spending other people's money.
7 posted on
01/03/2006 6:40:50 PM PST by
microgood
To: elkfersupper
I would suggest that this checkpoint was a personal hastle of 99.8 % of the population. This number of citizens should be able to override whatever hold MADD has and change the names of the city council. Go for it guys.
My guess is that the degree of responsible drinkers is high and getting higher and MADD may be able to claim a victory here. But a checkpoint that nabs this small a number is a waste. No other name for it. The city should invest in a junker police car and leave it parked somewhere. It will do as much good for a lot less trouble and cost.
8 posted on
01/03/2006 6:41:11 PM PST by
KC_for_Freedom
(Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
To: elkfersupper
Wow. So this checkpoint didn't actually catch any drunks at all? But it did catch lots of folks accused of other infractions?
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
I forget where I read that. Some fiction author, maybe...
To: elkfersupper
29 infractions, mostly for people traveling without a license You need a permit or a license to drive around in CT now?
To: elkfersupper
About 350 verbal warnings were issued, Michael said. 35% of the taxpayers who went through this were hassled by the Cops. No wonder the police are not well liked. Yes, Mr Policeman, you work for me, and no,a burned out marker light does not threaten the peace and security of this community.
To: elkfersupper
I read about this at Radley Balko's website and I thought it was hilarious. If one arrest counts as success, then what does failure look like?
22 posted on
01/03/2006 9:27:25 PM PST by
JTN
("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
25 posted on
01/05/2006 4:05:34 PM PST by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: Prime Choice
...'spose you already saw this...?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson