Skip to comments.
cia leak - plame affair
Posted on 12/27/2005 6:39:55 PM PST by rebekahrosanne
Okay, who doesn't know that the Plame leak was a setup? Pure entrapment! I'm not naming names - but feel free to guess. If you haven't figured this out yet, say "duh" now.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cheese; cialeak; duhnow; kittychow; moose; ticktock; troll; vk; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Coyoteman
lol!
I love these threads!
To: rebekahrosanne
Welcome to FR.
I agree. This looks like a set-up...But if this is the best set-up our spooks can do...Now that scares me.
22
posted on
12/27/2005 7:06:33 PM PST
by
labette
(Continually discovering things I am completely ignorant about...since 1959)
To: rebekahrosanne
If you haven't figured this out yet, say "duh" now. I think you already did.
23
posted on
12/27/2005 7:44:45 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(Non-Y2K-Compliant)
To: rebekahrosanne
24
posted on
12/27/2005 7:46:15 PM PST
by
quantim
(The Senate proves itself daily as the flagrant flaw in the Constitution.)
To: Coyoteman
Is not the rope longer in 'chat' than in 'breaking news?'
Entertainment on FR is crucial to financial donors.
25
posted on
12/27/2005 7:52:51 PM PST
by
quantim
(The Senate proves itself daily as the flagrant flaw in the Constitution.)
To: rebekahrosanne
Plame? Who's Plame? Do you know who been leaking classified information to the NYT? That is what inquiring minds want to know.
26
posted on
12/27/2005 7:58:05 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: quantim
The mods are patient. This account is still alive.
27
posted on
12/27/2005 7:58:45 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: rebekahrosanne
28
posted on
12/27/2005 8:17:43 PM PST
by
Paul_Denton
(The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
To: rebekahrosanne
To: rebekahrosanne
30
posted on
12/27/2005 8:20:24 PM PST
by
Paul_Denton
(The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
To: pcottraux
Finally. Live fire operational use for your new graphics :)
31
posted on
12/27/2005 8:20:51 PM PST
by
Paul_Denton
(The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
To: rebekahrosanne
32
posted on
12/27/2005 10:00:18 PM PST
by
MilleniumBug
(Pattycake, Pattycake, Wilson's the man...Bake me a yellowboy fast as you can.)
To: rebekahrosanne
33
posted on
12/27/2005 10:04:29 PM PST
by
MilleniumBug
(Pattycake, Pattycake, Wilson's the man...Bake me a yellowboy fast as you can.)
To: All
Wow. I am kind of new to FR and am a bit taken back by your responses and, frankly, relieved that I was not also 'welcomed' this way. Color me stupid, but what was it about the original post that would cause this kind of reaction? And what is a zot?
To: rebekahrosanne
You realize you are within range.
35
posted on
12/28/2005 4:38:08 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(I never got a job from a person on a government program.)
To: Kimberly GG
Wow. I am kind of new to FR and am a bit taken back by your responses and, frankly, relieved that I was not also 'welcomed' this way. Color me stupid, but what was it about the original post that would cause this kind of reaction? And what is a zot? Newly registered posters come here and post these one line vanities, with no link to back up this type of claim are considered trolls for the most part.
A ZOT is what happens to disrupter trolls, normally from DU and the moderators ban or suspend the accounts.
36
posted on
12/28/2005 4:43:11 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(I never got a job from a person on a government program.)
To: Kimberly GG
"Wow. I am kind of new to FR and am a bit taken back by your responses and, frankly, relieved that I was not also 'welcomed' this way. Color me stupid, but what was it about the original post that would cause this kind of reaction?"
It was a bad post, but I have no reason to think the person was a troll. It was a bad post because it was merely a vague comment with no link to a story or any kind of factual information that would provide a basis for further comment. The poster did not seem to appreciate the difference between starting a new thread, and making a comment on an existing thread. But there are alsosome self-righteous types in here who enjoy jumping on "newbies" (as if there is something wrong with being new, or not knowing the ropes).
To: Arrowhead1952
thank you for explaining. Do the letters in ZOT stand for something specific?
To: Steve_Seattle
thanks steve.....I am just 'learning' the ropes here myself ;)
To: rebekahrosanne
"What 'chu talking about?"
40
posted on
12/28/2005 11:56:08 AM PST
by
dfwgator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
