Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/20/2005 10:09:18 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: churchillbuff
I have been screaming this at the TV every time people discuss this propaganda film. Thank goodness they are talking about it now. The film is an all out assault on marriage.
2 posted on 12/20/2005 10:11:07 PM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

So... how many people have paid to see this stinkeroo?


3 posted on 12/20/2005 10:12:22 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
And I wish they'd stop calling it a cowboy movie...they are adulterous gay shepards.
4 posted on 12/20/2005 10:13:35 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
What a cowboy, huh....


5 posted on 12/20/2005 10:14:27 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Isn't that the movie about the sheepherders?


6 posted on 12/20/2005 10:15:04 PM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Guess what? I`ll never know about what this movie is all about because they ain`t getting my time or $$!


7 posted on 12/20/2005 10:15:52 PM PST by bybybill (GOD help us if the Rats win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Like one of the writers at Polipundit said, if this is the best Hollywood has to offer it's no wonder why nobody wants to watch their movies.


8 posted on 12/20/2005 10:16:41 PM PST by conservative_2001 (Defeat Jean Schmidt and Paul Hackett in 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
I haven't seen the movie so I will refrain from attacking it too harshly. But from what I have heard adultery does constitute a major part of the films plot. This is an interesting point and one that needs to be made more vocally. As a side note, it goes without saying that adultery or any other sin is not an excuse for violence which must be strongly condemned as well.
10 posted on 12/20/2005 10:18:39 PM PST by jecIIny (Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domini. Qui fecit coelum et terram.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

We Support Diversity & Tolerance in Adultery!

12 posted on 12/20/2005 10:24:30 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

If any readers here have the chance to listen to michael medved on talk radio I encourage you to give him a try.


13 posted on 12/20/2005 10:25:44 PM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

I'm very grateful to read and hear some in media finally get this most significant offense about this film and to start addressing it.

I've been writing this all along and that is that the film features the adulation and commemoration of very bad character and immorality and that's even before they enter the issue of homosexuality.

With cunning, this wretched writing by Annie Proulx that was adapted to the screen, manipulates people into sympathizing about terrible lack of ethics and worse, attempts to adulate that which is very corrupt.

The film features two people who are responsible for committing with intention and lack of remorse, cruelty and bringing about suffering for those who they seem to "stalk" -- women they marry and then betray without so much as a tear, themselves even, their children, and then one another.

And it's coasting through as being called something it isn't because it engages the acts of male homosexuals.

The film really is a very ugly thing that no one should so much as pay a dime toward. I'm just glad that some among media are now writing about the real issues involved in it.

I heard a fanatical, liberal "film/gossip" columnist earlier on O'Reilly (FOX) who was so shrilly insistent that it was a "wonderful film," that I thought she'd bite someone.


14 posted on 12/20/2005 10:33:54 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
What is it with sheep??????????? The towel heads can't just herd their sheep they've got to molest them. Freaking shepherds they leave the sheep alone and do each other. If I ever go into farming I'm gonna be working with cattle or buffalo anything but those dam* sheep.
21 posted on 12/20/2005 11:45:42 PM PST by kublia khan (Absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

jay leno's alternative title: "Penis Whisperer"


22 posted on 12/20/2005 11:48:22 PM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Would the Episcopal Church have voted in as bishop a man who divorced his wife and moved in with another woman? I don't think so. However, it was so trendy that he divorced his wife and moved in with his homosexual lover, that they just had to honor him for that. We are a perverted society.


31 posted on 12/21/2005 3:48:08 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
I won't be seeing this movie. I once worked with a guy who gave this assessment of a movie: "There are no fight scenes, no guns, no one is killed, no naked women, no fast cars, no explosions, no tough guys and no one you wanted to see die. Because of all that, it wasn't worth a ****."

I understand it is two extremely sensitive homos who give the sheep a break by getting it on with each other.

33 posted on 12/21/2005 3:56:05 AM PST by chronic_loser ((Handle provided free of charge as flame bait for the neurally vacant.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

Would they applaud a film where a gay man has an affair with a woman and ultimately decides to go straight?


35 posted on 12/21/2005 4:28:00 AM PST by stocksthatgoup ("It's inexcusable to tell us to 'connect the dots' and not give us the tools to do so." G W Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
According to most reviewers this movie is not about happy cowboys (gays). Gay means merry, carefree, happy. Homosexuals are definitely not gay most of the time.

Going through life unable to have a normal human relationship with the opposite gender is anything but a happy life.

Hollywood will of course heap praise on the movie. That's another strike against it.
39 posted on 12/21/2005 5:44:27 AM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

It's a typical pro-Left Wing Hollyweed production. What really bothers me is that because of the lack of creativity in hollywierd we can expect at least two remakes of this garbage.


40 posted on 12/21/2005 6:54:43 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
LOL I never new this film existed until I read about it on FR every day.

May go see it, see what all the fuss is about. LOL

41 posted on 12/21/2005 8:24:16 AM PST by tonycavanagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

58 posted on 12/21/2005 9:34:08 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson